• Binkit/Tickit Poll issue

    From Fernando Toledo@1:103/705 to GitLab note in main/sbbs on Sun Jun 15 12:26:56 2025
    https://gitlab.synchro.net/main/sbbs/-/issues/343#note_7394

    Hi all! I still have too many call out's from binkit for downlinks nodes.
    I know that is not problem.. But they are wasting meaningless resources, including filling up the binkit log with noise that these nodes would never connect to.
    binkit should never call nodes that are not marked for polling
    --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Gamgee@1:103/705 to Fernando Toledo on Sun Jun 15 15:53:55 2025
    Fernando Toledo wrote to GitLab note in main/sbbs <=-

    https://gitlab.synchro.net/main/sbbs/-/issues/343#note_7394

    Hi all! I still have too many call out's from binkit for downlinks
    nodes. I know that is not problem.. But they are wasting meaningless resources, including filling up the binkit log with noise that these
    nodes would never connect to. binkit should never call nodes that are
    not marked for polling

    It's not so much a binkit issue as it is a tickit issue... I read your
    issue at the link above and can also confirm that this is still
    happening. In fact you can have a downlink on "Pause" (their connected
    link section has "Passive = true" in it), and Tickit will still create
    .dlo files to send them the file referenced in an incoming .TIC.

    There are a couple of other bugs/feature requests pending for Tickit
    also... Hopefully some attention soon! :-)



    ... I was wondering why the baseball was getting bigger. Then it hit me.
    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)