There's no logic in that since incidents are rarely 90 seconds long.
Sounds like the left is looking for ways to get around them being seen
in their illegal behavior.
In another posting I suggested that a reasonable reason to shut off a
chest cam might be while in the restroom. I don't recall many times I
made a trip to the loo having done my business, almost always
including hand washing in under 90 seconds.
If you can you definitely have my respect :)
You'd be allowed to keep if off by hitting it every 90 seconds (...which >would indicate continued intention).
On Sun, 12 Apr 2026 11:36:29 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
In another posting I suggested that a reasonable reason to shut off a
chest cam might be while in the restroom. I don't recall many times I
made a trip to the loo having done my business, almost always
including hand washing in under 90 seconds.
If you can you definitely have my respect :)
You'd be allowed to keep if off by hitting it every 90 seconds (...which
would indicate continued intention).
Didn't mean to be impertinent but I'd be highly surprised if there has
ever been an officer who has NEVER visited the loo while on duty.
Obviously this isn't something you engage them in conversation about
:)
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
On Mar 27, 2026 at 11:24:04 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>> On 3/27/2026 2:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
"Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
The whole BLM demand for bodycams movement has been one of the biggest
self-owns in the history of race hustling.
I believe the above line was written by BTR but Adam may know the term >>>>>> - I've never heard the term "self-owns" before - is that the same as >>>>>> the British football (e.g. what we North Americans call soccer) folks >>>>>> call an "own goal"?
It's "You can't stop thinking about me. I own your headspace." You're >>>>> obsessing over having lost a meaningless argument on line in a
humiliating way rather than just immediately acting like an adult and >>>>> owning up to having made a mistake.
In this case, it was failure to consider that video evidence gathered is >>>>> neutral and that a bodycam is going to capture the person being
encountered by police misbehaving and will not provide evidence of P.I. >>>>> to justify a lawsuit against police.
Earlier this year, Democrats in Congress were demanding that ICE agents be >>>> required to wear bodycams, something to which the Republicans readily
agreed. Now, as part of their DHS shutdown demands, they're backtracking >>>> and saying, "On second thought, we don't really want the cameras on all the
time. We demand rules about when they can and can't be recording."
Nothing says "peaceful protest" like demanding all cameras be turned off. >>>> Their problem is that the cameras don't know who the approved villains are >>>> and tend to capture everything without political bias.
Googling tells me only that Dems (Mar 24) *want* the bodycams (that
Biden ordered for *all* govt. cops). Got a cite of the "backtracking"?
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/07/democrats-fear-body-cameras-could-be-ices-new-mass-surveillance-tool-00769363
Pardon my ignorance but what's the benefit of requiring officers to
wear switched off body cameras?
On 4/21/2026 12:58 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2026 11:36:29 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
Didn't mean to be impertinent but I'd be highly surprised if there has
ever been an officer who has NEVER visited the loo while on duty.
Obviously this isn't something you engage them in conversation about
:)
Few bathroom activities fully occupy both hands for a whole minute.
Maintaining the narrative that cops are racists.
It's not helpfull when it shows the so-called
"victims" deserved what happened to them.
On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 16:26:13 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 4/21/2026 12:58 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:Since we're talking police officers I'm assuming you're talking ONLY
On Sun, 12 Apr 2026 11:36:29 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
Didn't mean to be impertinent but I'd be highly surprised if there has
ever been an officer who has NEVER visited the loo while on duty.
Obviously this isn't something you engage them in conversation about
:)
Few bathroom activities fully occupy both hands for a whole minute.
about things you'd do away from home.
(For instance I routinely use both my hands for a whole minute or more
both while in the shower and while drying myself afterwards. Needless
to say those times are not about "public service"!)
| Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| Users: | 15 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 167:49:12 |
| Calls: | 216 |
| Files: | 21,502 |
| Messages: | 82,743 |