Subject: Re: rec.arts.sf.written Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) by Evelyn Leeper
On 30/07/2026 14:19, Lawrence D?Oliveiro wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 16:40:37 -0500, Lynn McGuire wrote:
""SF" as used here means "speculative fiction" and includes science
fiction, fantasy, horror (a.k.a. dark fantasy), etc."
I prefer to group fiction into two categories, this way:
* ?interpolative? fiction, which takes existing matters of fact or
tradition and tries to come up with new propositions that lie
essentially within the same parameters
* ?extrapolative? fiction, which tries to go beyond existing matters
of fact by proposing new ideas in areas where human experience has
not (yet) gone.
How interesting.
I would put SF in the second category.
I assume you are using SF to mean Science Fiction which includes
sociology and political science. Won't they fit in both categories?
Am I betraying my prejudice by
claiming that most fantasy and horror would belong firmly in the first category?
The boundaries between genres have begun more and more vague.
In a more sensible world, the author of the romantic comedy, The Time Traveller's Wife, would have had her keyboard confiscated before
impacting such shame on the other more highly respected genre it may
have been mistaken for.
You imply that interpolative fiction is inferior by claiming a
prejudice. Whilst my SpecF preference is also for science fiction, I
have read brilliant five star fantasy. One horror which escapes your Aristotelian categorisation also comes to mind.
The Terror. Dan Simmonds. No survivors from this tale means no
contribution to the human experience. Extrapolative Horror.
Some of my favourite Fantasies.
Gormenghast. Mervyn Peake. Interpolative fiction.
The Fionavar Tapestry. Guy Gavriel Kay. Interpolative fiction.
Anything by David Mitchell. Minimal science fiction, minimal fantasy.
Same for Joe Abercrombie. (Except the YA stuff).
--- PyGate Linux v1.5.19
* Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)