xkcd: Metric Tip
https://www.xkcd.com/3164/
No, no, no, no.
I write software for a living and just added pressure dimensional units >number 25 and 26, mH2O (meters of H2O) and mH2Og (meters of H2O gauge). >Mixing dimensional units is a very bad thing for programmers, we will
screw it up.
Explained at:
https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/3164:_Metric_Tip
xkcd: Metric Tip
ÿÿ https://www.xkcd.com/3164/
No, no, no, no.
I write software for a living and just added pressure dimensional units number 25 and 26, mH2O (meters of H2O) and mH2Og (meters of H2O gauge). Mixing dimensional units is a very bad thing for programmers, we will
screw it up.
Explained at:
ÿÿ https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/3164:_Metric_Tip
On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 13:21:38 -0600, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
xkcd: Metric Tip
https://www.xkcd.com/3164/
No, no, no, no.
I write software for a living and just added pressure dimensional units
number 25 and 26, mH2O (meters of H2O) and mH2Og (meters of H2O gauge).
Mixing dimensional units is a very bad thing for programmers, we will
screw it up.
Explained at:
https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/3164:_Metric_Tip
As I believe one of the Mars missions demonstrated disasterously when
the bits written in the USA to handle the landing took over from the
bits written in Europe. Or something like that.
On 11/6/2025 2:21 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
xkcd: Metric Tip
ÿÿÿ https://www.xkcd.com/3164/
No, no, no, no.
I write software for a living and just added pressure dimensional
units number 25 and 26, mH2O (meters of H2O) and mH2Og (meters of H2O
gauge).
OK, I'll bite:
What's the difference between the two?
xkcd: Metric Tip
https://www.xkcd.com/3164/
No, no, no, no.
I write software for a living and just added pressure dimensional units number 25 and 26, mH2O (meters of H2O) and mH2Og (meters of H2O gauge). Mixing dimensional units is a very bad thing for programmers, we will
screw it up.
On 11/6/2025 2:21 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
xkcd: Metric Tip
ÿÿÿ https://www.xkcd.com/3164/
No, no, no, no.
I write software for a living and just added pressure dimensional
units number 25 and 26, mH2O (meters of H2O) and mH2Og (meters of H2O
gauge). Mixing dimensional units is a very bad thing for programmers,
we will screw it up.
Explained at:
ÿÿÿ https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/3164:_Metric_Tip
OK, I'll bite:
What's the difference between the two?
pt
On 11/6/2025 2:21 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
xkcd: Metric Tip
ÿÿÿ https://www.xkcd.com/3164/
No, no, no, no.
I write software for a living and just added pressure dimensional
units number 25 and 26, mH2O (meters of H2O) and mH2Og (meters of H2O
gauge). Mixing dimensional units is a very bad thing for programmers,
we will screw it up.
Explained at:
ÿÿÿ https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/3164:_Metric_Tip
OK, I'll bite:
What's the difference between the two?
pt
On 11/6/2025 2:21 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
xkcd: Metric Tip
ÿÿ https://www.xkcd.com/3164/
No, no, no, no.
I write software for a living and just added pressure dimensional units
number 25 and 26, mH2O (meters of H2O) and mH2Og (meters of H2O gauge).
Mixing dimensional units is a very bad thing for programmers, we will
screw it up.
Explained at:
ÿÿ https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/3164:_Metric_Tip
OK, I'll bite:
What's the difference between the two?
Having a trailing a on the absolute pressure units would be better.
Where were you over the last 56 years ? I now have these strings
embedded in my software in thousands of hands, never to be changed now.
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
Having a trailing a on the absolute pressure units would be better.
Where were you over the last 56 years ? I now have these strings
embedded in my software in thousands of hands, never to be changed now.
What about inches of water, inches of mercury, millimeters of mercury, millimeters of water, psf, and torr? And we use dBtorr sometimes too.
I once worked in a facility with a gauge marked lb/cm2 and I never did
figure out how they wound up with that one.
I recently heard that the US amost got metric units, but the people
who were sent to revolutionary France to get measures of the meter
and the kilogram were caught by pirates, and thus it didn't happen.
Not sure if this story is true or not.
On the other hand, this would have deprived us of a sketch
that I find so hilariously funny that I keep re-watching it:
"Washington's Dream", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYqfVE-fykk .
Any US engineer, or any engineer working with somebody from the US,
should be obliged by law to watch it :-)
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
Having a trailing a on the absolute pressure units would be better.
Where were you over the last 56 years ? I now have these strings
embedded in my software in thousands of hands, never to be changed now.
What about inches of water, inches of mercury, millimeters of mercury, millimeters of water, psf, and torr? And we use dBtorr sometimes too.
I once worked in a facility with a gauge marked lb/cm2 and I never did
figure out how they wound up with that one.
--scott
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
Having a trailing a on the absolute pressure units would be better.
Where were you over the last 56 years ? I now have these strings
embedded in my software in thousands of hands, never to be changed now.
What about inches of water, inches of mercury, millimeters of mercury, millimeters of water, psf, and torr? And we use dBtorr sometimes too.
On 11/8/25 13:20, Scott Dorsey wrote:
I once worked in a facility with a gauge marked lb/cm2 and I never did
figure out how they wound up with that one.
Engineers.
Bobbie Sellers <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
On 11/8/25 13:20, Scott Dorsey wrote:
I once worked in a facility with a gauge marked lb/cm2 and I never did
figure out how they wound up with that one.
Engineers.
Yes, clearly. There's some number that is easiest to calculate with those units so that's the unit they use. But what is that number and why is it easiest to calculate that way? There is a story here and I bet it turns
out to be an interesting one.
On 8/11/25 07:01, Thomas Koenig wrote:
I recently heard that the US amost got metric units, but the people
who were sent to revolutionary France to get measures of the meter
and the kilogram were caught by pirates, and thus it didn't happen.
Not sure if this story is true or not.
On the other hand, this would have deprived us of a sketch
that I find so hilariously funny that I keep re-watching it:
"Washington's Dream", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYqfVE-fykk .
This would have been quite funny to read. However, slave owner
Washington's dead pan delivery made this brilliant comedy. I enjoyed
part 2 just as much.
Thank you.
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
Having a trailing a on the absolute pressure units would be better.
Where were you over the last 56 years ? I now have these strings
embedded in my software in thousands of hands, never to be changed now.
What about inches of water, inches of mercury, millimeters of mercury, >millimeters of water, psf, and torr? And we use dBtorr sometimes too.
I once worked in a facility with a gauge marked lb/cm2 and I never did
figure out how they wound up with that one.
On 11/7/2025 11:34 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
On 11/6/2025 2:21 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
xkcd: Metric Tip
ÿÿÿ https://www.xkcd.com/3164/
No, no, no, no.
I write software for a living and just added pressure dimensional
units number 25 and 26, mH2O (meters of H2O) and mH2Og (meters of H2O
gauge). Mixing dimensional units is a very bad thing for programmers,
we will screw it up.
Explained at:
ÿÿÿ https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/3164:_Metric_Tip
OK, I'll bite:
What's the difference between the two?
pt
BTW, 0 psig = 14.696 psia at sea level.
At Pike's Peak, 0 psig = 9.28 psia due to the elevation change (14,115
feet, 4,302 meters, above sea level).
Bing is your friend:
A pound per square centimeter (lb/cm=B2) is a non-metric measurement
unit of surface or areal density. The surface density is used to
measure the thickness of paper, fabric and other thin materials.
So, did the facility (by any chance) work with/produce thin materials
whose thickness needed to be measured?
Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:measure
Bing is your friend:
A pound per square centimeter (lb/cm=B2) is a non-metric measurement
unit of surface or areal density. The surface density is used to
measure the thickness of paper, fabric and other thin materials.
Bing is definitely not my friend. For one thing, it's not a non-metric >measurement, it's partially metric. And it's a very curious way to
surface density.
You might want to do that if you have a material that is measured inmetric
units, but whose total mass is measured in American units. That's whatI'd
like explained.
--So, did the facility (by any chance) work with/produce thin materials
whose thickness needed to be measured?
No, it was a wind tunnel. But I think the basic source again was
measuring density of something derived from mixed units.
| Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| Users: | 14 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 254:44:24 |
| Calls: | 184 |
| Files: | 21,502 |
| Messages: | 79,032 |