On 9/6/25 06:35, a425couple wrote:-----------------------
On 9/4/25 20:05, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
Hi again denizens of SF.written
I am 1/2 way through 1632. Doing fine with it.
I had earlier picked up for a pittance quite a few of the
Ring of Fire series at library discard sale.
But figured I better start, at the start = 1632.
Sensible of you foolish of the library since if the series' popularity
continues to climb they will have to buy more copies sooner or later.
<https://www.bookseriesinorder.com/ring-of-fire/>
On 9/6/25 09:57, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
-----------------------
On 9/6/25 06:35, a425couple wrote:
On 9/4/25 20:05, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
Hi again denizens of SF.written
It is an interesting practice of our library system.
I am 1/2 way through 1632. Doing fine with it.
I had earlier picked up for a pittance quite a few of the
Ring of Fire series at library discard sale.
But figured I better start, at the start = 1632.
Sensible of you foolish of the library since if the series'
popularity
continues to climb they will have to buy more copies sooner or later.
<https://www.bookseriesinorder.com/ring-of-fire/>
They estimate popularity and demand of a book.
They intentionally buy enough of the popular books
to not have long wait times of the patrons.
And then, after the initial demand dies down,
they discard.
Perhaps a higher expense that many would want,
but the bond issues keep passing,,,, so?
It is an interesting practice of our library system.
They estimate popularity and demand of a book.
They intentionally buy enough of the popular books
to not have long wait times of the patrons.
And then, after the initial demand dies down,
they discard.
Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
---|---|
Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
Users: | 14 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 190:34:51 |
Calls: | 178 |
Files: | 21,502 |
Messages: | 79,927 |