Note: I decided to repost this since Freeman Dyson didn't postulate a
hollow shell, but a massive swarm of objects.
The short version: this book was a disappointment.
These two books have recently been reprinted by a new publisher and
Stirling wrote a 3rd title, _Lords of Creation_ to go with them. People
are exploring that sphere, but NONE of them appear to be aware
that a hollow sphere has no internal gravity force. They are all walking >around in a 1 g field.
Note: I decided to repost this since Freeman Dyson didn't postulate a
hollow shell, but a massive swarm of objects.
The short version: this book was a disappointment.
About 2 decades ago, Stirling wrote 2 books that modernized the mid 20th century Planetary Romance genre (_The Sky People_ and _In the Courts of
the Crimson Kings_). Both Venus and Mars had been terraformed during the Mesozoic by a highly advanced interstellar civilization and had been
seeded by life from Earth (with periodic inserts of more species,
including humans, up to about 5 thousand years ago for Venus and perhaps
200 hundred thousand years ago for Mars). The most advanced cultures on
Venus were Bronze age, but Mars had a uniform civilization with
extremely advanced bio-tech on a dying planet. In the epilog of _In the Courts of the Crimson Kings_ some gates were opened that connected Venus
and Mars to other worlds, and Earth to a hollow sphere, 2 Astronomic
units in diameter.
These two books have recently been reprinted by a new publisher and
Stirling wrote a 3rd title, _Lords of Creation_ to go with them. People
are exploring that sphere, but NONE of them appear to be aware
that a hollow sphere has no internal gravity force. They are all walking around in a 1 g field. In addition, it appears that people had been
snatched from Earth as recently as the later part of the 19th century
and had replicated that 19th century technology. I have my doubts that
there were enough people in the original party to have the necessary
total knowledge to do this.
On 8/22/2025 1:13 AM, Robert Woodward wrote:
Note: I decided to repost this since Freeman Dyson didn't postulate a
hollow shell, but a massive swarm of objects.
The short version: this book was a disappointment.
About 2 decades ago, Stirling wrote 2 books that modernized the mid 20th
century Planetary Romance genre (_The Sky People_ and _In the Courts of
the Crimson Kings_). Both Venus and Mars had been terraformed during the
Mesozoic by a highly advanced interstellar civilization and had been
seeded by life from Earth (with periodic inserts of more species,
including humans, up to about 5 thousand years ago for Venus and perhaps
200 hundred thousand years ago for Mars). The most advanced cultures on
Venus were Bronze age, but Mars had a uniform civilization with
extremely advanced bio-tech on a dying planet. In the epilog of _In the
Courts of the Crimson Kings_ some gates were opened that connected Venus
and Mars to other worlds, and Earth to a hollow sphere, 2 Astronomic
units in diameter.
These two books have recently been reprinted by a new publisher and
Stirling wrote a 3rd title, _Lords of Creation_ to go with them. People
are exploring that sphere, but NONE of them appear to be aware
that a hollow sphere has no internal gravity force. They are all walking
around in a 1 g field. In addition, it appears that people had been
snatched from Earth as recently as the later part of the 19th century
and had replicated that 19th century technology. I have my doubts that
there were enough people in the original party to have the necessary
total knowledge to do this.
I thought that Dyson Spheres had a star at the center of them for power ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere
"A Dyson sphere is a hypothetical megastructure that encompasses a star
and captures a large percentage of its power output.[1][2][3] The
concept is a thought experiment that attempts to imagine how a
spacefaring civilization would meet its energy requirements once those requirements exceed what can be generated from the home planet's
resources alone. Because only a tiny fraction of a star's energy
emissions reaches the surface of any orbiting planet, building
structures encircling a star would enable a civilization to harvest far
more energy."
That would certainly give off gravity.
On 8/22/2025 4:56 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
On 8/22/2025 1:13 AM, Robert Woodward wrote:
Note: I decided to repost this since Freeman Dyson didn't postulate a
hollow shell, but a massive swarm of objects.
The short version: this book was a disappointment.
About 2 decades ago, Stirling wrote 2 books that modernized the mid 20th >>> century Planetary Romance genre (_The Sky People_ and _In the Courts of
the Crimson Kings_). Both Venus and Mars had been terraformed during the >>> Mesozoic by a highly advanced interstellar civilization and had been
seeded by life from Earth (with periodic inserts of more species,
including humans, up to about 5 thousand years ago for Venus and perhaps >>> 200 hundred thousand years ago for Mars). The most advanced cultures on
Venus were Bronze age, but Mars had a uniform civilization with
extremely advanced bio-tech on a dying planet. In the epilog of _In the
Courts of the Crimson Kings_ some gates were opened that connected Venus >>> and Mars to other worlds, and Earth to a hollow sphere, 2 Astronomic
units in diameter.
These two books have recently been reprinted by a new publisher and
Stirling wrote a 3rd title, _Lords of Creation_ to go with them. People
are exploring that sphere, but NONE of them appear to be aware
that a hollow sphere has no internal gravity force. They are all walking >>> around in a 1 g field. In addition, it appears that people had been
snatched from Earth as recently as the later part of the 19th century
and had replicated that 19th century technology. I have my doubts that
there were enough people in the original party to have the necessary
total knowledge to do this.
I thought that Dyson Spheres had a star at the center of them for power ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere
"A Dyson sphere is a hypothetical megastructure that encompasses a star
and captures a large percentage of its power output.[1][2][3] The
concept is a thought experiment that attempts to imagine how a
spacefaring civilization would meet its energy requirements once those
requirements exceed what can be generated from the home planet's
resources alone. Because only a tiny fraction of a star's energy
emissions reaches the surface of any orbiting planet, building
structures encircling a star would enable a civilization to harvest far
more energy."
That would certainly give off gravity.
You'd fall toward the sun, in that case. Very, Very slowly.
If I trust the AI in my browser, the sun's gravity at 93 million
miles is about 1/1642 g.
On 8/22/2025 4:56 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
On 8/22/2025 1:13 AM, Robert Woodward wrote:
Note: I decided to repost this since Freeman Dyson didn't postulate a
hollow shell, but a massive swarm of objects.
The short version: this book was a disappointment.
About 2 decades ago, Stirling wrote 2 books that modernized the mid 20th >>> century Planetary Romance genre (_The Sky People_ and _In the Courts of
the Crimson Kings_). Both Venus and Mars had been terraformed during the >>> Mesozoic by a highly advanced interstellar civilization and had been
seeded by life from Earth (with periodic inserts of more species,
including humans, up to about 5 thousand years ago for Venus and perhaps >>> 200 hundred thousand years ago for Mars). The most advanced cultures on
Venus were Bronze age, but Mars had a uniform civilization with
extremely advanced bio-tech on a dying planet. In the epilog of _In the
Courts of the Crimson Kings_ some gates were opened that connected Venus >>> and Mars to other worlds, and Earth to a hollow sphere, 2 Astronomic
units in diameter.
These two books have recently been reprinted by a new publisher and
Stirling wrote a 3rd title, _Lords of Creation_ to go with them. People
are exploring that sphere, but NONE of them appear to be aware
that a hollow sphere has no internal gravity force. They are all walking >>> around in a 1 g field. In addition, it appears that people had been
snatched from Earth as recently as the later part of the 19th century
and had replicated that 19th century technology. I have my doubts that
there were enough people in the original party to have the necessary
total knowledge to do this.
I thought that Dyson Spheres had a star at the center of them for power ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere
"A Dyson sphere is a hypothetical megastructure that encompasses a
star and captures a large percentage of its power output.[1][2][3] The
concept is a thought experiment that attempts to imagine how a
spacefaring civilization would meet its energy requirements once those
requirements exceed what can be generated from the home planet's
resources alone. Because only a tiny fraction of a star's energy
emissions reaches the surface of any orbiting planet, building
structures encircling a star would enable a civilization to harvest
far more energy."
That would certainly give off gravity.
You'd fall toward the sun, in that case. Very, Very slowly.
If I trust the AI in my browser, the sun's gravity at 93 million
miles is about 1/1642 g.
pt
In article <robertaw-0A4722.23132121082025@news.individual.net>,
Robert Woodward <robertaw@drizzle.com> wrote:
Note: I decided to repost this since Freeman Dyson didn't postulate a >hollow shell, but a massive swarm of objects.
These two books have recently been reprinted by a new publisher and >Stirling wrote a 3rd title, _Lords of Creation_ to go with them. People >are exploring that sphere, but NONE of them appear to be aware
that a hollow sphere has no internal gravity force. They are all walking >around in a 1 g field.
This is a recurring issue in Dyson shell SF. Authors want the characters
in illuminated landscapes, thus the inner shell.
On 8/22/2025 4:56 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
That would certainly give off gravity.
You'd fall toward the sun, in that case. Very, Very slowly.
If I trust the AI in my browser, the sun's gravity at 93 million
miles is about 1/1642 g.
In article <1089que$1bj$1@reader1.panix.com>,Wouldn't a completely enclosed shell be unstable, like Niven's
jdnicoll@panix.com (James Nicoll) wrote:
In article <robertaw-0A4722.23132121082025@news.individual.net>,<SINP>
Robert Woodward <robertaw@drizzle.com> wrote:
Note: I decided to repost this since Freeman Dyson didn't postulate a
hollow shell, but a massive swarm of objects.
These two books have recently been reprinted by a new publisher and
Stirling wrote a 3rd title, _Lords of Creation_ to go with them. People
are exploring that sphere, but NONE of them appear to be aware
that a hollow sphere has no internal gravity force. They are all walking >> >around in a 1 g field.
This is a recurring issue in Dyson shell SF. Authors want the characters
in illuminated landscapes, thus the inner shell.
And I can think of two handwaves to "solve" the problem. I have a
suspicion that Stirling is unaware of this property of hollow shells
(BTW, the wikipedia article on Dyson Sphere mentions this, though in passing).
Robert Woodward <robertaw@drizzle.com> writes:
In article <1089que$1bj$1@reader1.panix.com>,Wouldn't a completely enclosed shell be unstable, like Niven's
jdnicoll@panix.com (James Nicoll) wrote:
In article <robertaw-0A4722.23132121082025@news.individual.net>,<SINP>
Robert Woodward <robertaw@drizzle.com> wrote:
Note: I decided to repost this since Freeman Dyson didn't postulate a
hollow shell, but a massive swarm of objects.
These two books have recently been reprinted by a new publisher and
Stirling wrote a 3rd title, _Lords of Creation_ to go with them. People >>> >are exploring that sphere, but NONE of them appear to be aware
that a hollow sphere has no internal gravity force. They are all walking >>> >around in a 1 g field.
This is a recurring issue in Dyson shell SF. Authors want the characters >>> in illuminated landscapes, thus the inner shell.
And I can think of two handwaves to "solve" the problem. I have a
suspicion that Stirling is unaware of this property of hollow shells
(BTW, the wikipedia article on Dyson Sphere mentions this, though in
passing).
Ringworld, and would require something to keep the sun from drifting off >center and eventually hitting one side of the shell?
Pretty close. I get 1/1656.
If I trust the AI in my browser, the sun's gravity at 93 million
miles is about 1/1642 g.
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 20:33:23 -0400, Cryptoengineer
<petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
<snippo Dyson Sphere stuff>
If I trust the AI in my browser, the sun's gravity at 93 million
miles is about 1/1642 g.
Trust an AI? <ROTFL>
Did I tell you about the AI in my browser? When asked if the two parts
of a doorknob lock (one with the lock in the knob, the other with a
turnable thing to lock it on the inside) was recyclable it said "yes, >provided it is empty and clean".
IOW, it thought I was talking about a bottle or a jar.
So much for the "I" in "AI".
Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:
So much for the "I" in "AI".
It didn't think. It strung together words that fit a pattern.
In article <kcnjaklunepcpb4fac4ld94p65f7so2813@4ax.com>,
Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 20:33:23 -0400, Cryptoengineer
<petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
<snippo Dyson Sphere stuff>
If I trust the AI in my browser, the sun's gravity at 93 million
miles is about 1/1642 g.
Trust an AI? <ROTFL>
Did I tell you about the AI in my browser? When asked if the two parts
of a doorknob lock (one with the lock in the knob, the other with a >>turnable thing to lock it on the inside) was recyclable it said "yes, >>provided it is empty and clean".
IOW, it thought I was talking about a bottle or a jar.=20
So much for the "I" in "AI".
It didn't think. It strung together words that fit a pattern.=20
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 16:07:31 -0000 (UTC), jdnicoll@panix.com (James
Nicoll) wrote:
In article <kcnjaklunepcpb4fac4ld94p65f7so2813@4ax.com>,
Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 20:33:23 -0400, Cryptoengineer
<petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
<snippo Dyson Sphere stuff>
If I trust the AI in my browser, the sun's gravity at 93 million
miles is about 1/1642 g.
Trust an AI? <ROTFL>
Did I tell you about the AI in my browser? When asked if the two parts
of a doorknob lock (one with the lock in the knob, the other with a >>>turnable thing to lock it on the inside) was recyclable it said "yes, >>>provided it is empty and clean".
IOW, it thought I was talking about a bottle or a jar.
So much for the "I" in "AI".
It didn't think. It strung together words that fit a pattern.
So I have read here and elsewhere. I do not doubt it.
But how does this improve the situation?
Why should we give /any/ credence to something that just strings
together words?
On 8/22/2025 1:13 AM, Robert Woodward wrote:
Note: I decided to repost this since Freeman Dyson didn't postulate a
hollow shell, but a massive swarm of objects.
The short version: this book was a disappointment.
About 2 decades ago, Stirling wrote 2 books that modernized the mid 20th
century Planetary Romance genre (_The Sky People_ and _In the Courts of
the Crimson Kings_). Both Venus and Mars had been terraformed during the
Mesozoic by a highly advanced interstellar civilization and had been
seeded by life from Earth (with periodic inserts of more species,
including humans, up to about 5 thousand years ago for Venus and perhaps
200 hundred thousand years ago for Mars). The most advanced cultures on
Venus were Bronze age, but Mars had a uniform civilization with
extremely advanced bio-tech on a dying planet. In the epilog of _In the
Courts of the Crimson Kings_ some gates were opened that connected Venus
and Mars to other worlds, and Earth to a hollow sphere, 2 Astronomic
units in diameter.
These two books have recently been reprinted by a new publisher and
Stirling wrote a 3rd title, _Lords of Creation_ to go with them. People
are exploring that sphere, but NONE of them appear to be aware
that a hollow sphere has no internal gravity force. They are all walking
around in a 1 g field. In addition, it appears that people had been
snatched from Earth as recently as the later part of the 19th century
and had replicated that 19th century technology. I have my doubts that
there were enough people in the original party to have the necessary
total knowledge to do this.
I thought that Dyson Spheres had a star at the center of them for power ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere
"A Dyson sphere is a hypothetical megastructure that encompasses a star
and captures a large percentage of its power output.[1][2][3] The
concept is a thought experiment that attempts to imagine how a
spacefaring civilization would meet its energy requirements once those requirements exceed what can be generated from the home planet's
resources alone. Because only a tiny fraction of a star's energy
emissions reaches the surface of any orbiting planet, building
structures encircling a star would enable a civilization to harvest far
more energy."
That would certainly give off gravity.
Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
---|---|
Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
Users: | 11 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 48:42:11 |
Calls: | 166 |
Files: | 21,502 |
Messages: | 77,711 |