• Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=93The_US_Likely_Has_?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?8_Years=97At

    From Paul S Person@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Jun 23 02:14:56 2025
    Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=93The_US_Likely_Has_?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?8_Years=97At_Most=97Bef?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ore_Crisis=94?=

    On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 12:15:01 -0400 (EDT), kludge@panix.com (Scott
    Dorsey) wrote:

    Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> wrote:

    Is the crisis because the OAS fund cannot
    pay elderly SS subscribers due to the government
    pilfering it, or is it because the government
    pilfering has to stop when the money is all gone?

    The government pilfering is a problem, and it's been happening since
    Reagan. =20

    The aging population is also a problem, with fewer younger people paying
    into the system as more aging people are paid by it. (And yes, higher >immigration rates can fix this one.)

    Some people have made the argument that mathematically, if the cap on
    income was removed from the social security witholdings, so that=20 >billionaires were paying at the same percentage rate as millionaires
    instead of the same amount, that it would solve the current OAS deficit >problem. This is true, and it's certainly a good plan from any =
    viewpoint
    except that of the very rich, but it's also kicking the can down the =
    road
    a bit since eventually the very rich are likely to get paid back a good >portion of that a generation later.

    <https://ssa.tools/guides/earnings-cap>

    Note that, although the /table/ starts in 1956, the text after the
    table traces it back to 1937.

    And it was $106,200 in 2023. So, that year, billionaires paid the same
    as people making $106,200 (as, indeed, did millionaires).=20

    Which means that raising the cap would affect a lot more people than
    just millionaires and billionaires.

    Having been reminded of this, your comment on getting it back are
    quite correct. What would be needed is a separate payment to support
    SSA (and Medicare, if needed) which does not increase the maximum
    benefit amount. This might be a harder sell.

    The /honest/ way (if I may use the term "honest" in this context) is
    to raise the income tax rate on the highest bracket(s) and treat
    /that/ as the additional SSA support payment.

    But the Republicans won't do this -- they are fixated on lowering
    those rates every chance they can get.

    The Democrates might do this -- but they would find sexier things to
    do with the money than to prop up dull old Social Security.

    This is why we need /new/ political parties. Two of them, both
    centrist, one slightly right (fiscally conservative) and one slightly
    left (safety-net oriented, say) who will talk to each other and reach
    a compromise.
    --=20
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- MBSE BBS v1.1.1 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul S Person@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Jun 23 02:40:17 2025
    Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=93The_US_Likely_Has_?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?8_Years=97At_Most=97Bef?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ore_Crisis=94?=

    On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 15:12:25 -0500, Lynn McGuire
    <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 6/21/2025 2:17 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

    Higher immigration will not fix this problem as most of the =
    immigrants
    are uneducated and cannot speak the majority language, English.
    =20
    What does that have to do with being able to pay into the social =
    security
    system?
    =20
    My grandparents were uneducated and my grandmother never did learn =
    English
    even after seventy years in the country. But she ran a cheese factory=
    and
    became a successful businessperson.
    =20
    It used to be that we allowed immigration to the USA for college
    graduates and English competency only. We still allow about 1.3 =
    million
    people per year to immigrant legally to the USA, mostly family of
    existing citizens.
    =20
    When was this? It certainly wasn't when my grandparents came here.
    --scott

    The USA immigration laws were put in place in 1925 ? and highly modified=
    =20
    in 1965 by Ted Kennedy, etc. I do not know about the immigration laws=20 >prior to 1925 which were undoubtedly different.

    This page <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965>
    also discusses the differences from the 1925 Act. And earlier acts.
    And traces the 1965 Act to a government study President Truman
    directed be done in 1952.

    However, as Teddy was in the Senate in 1965, I am sure he had some
    part to play. Such as voting for it.
    --=20
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- MBSE BBS v1.1.1 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul S Person@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Jun 23 02:46:09 2025
    Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=93The_US_Likely_Has_?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?8_Years=97At_Most=97Bef?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ore_Crisis=94?=

    On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 18:21:29 -0700, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

    On 6/21/2025 11:57 AM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    =20
    It used to be that we allowed immigration to the USA for college=20
    graduates and English competency only. =20

    ROFLMAO

    We still allow about 1.3 million=20
    people per year to immigrant legally to the USA, mostly family of=20
    existing citizens.
    =20
    Uh, no, ICE is currently arresting and deporting non-American born=20
    spouses of US citizens. Along with naturalized non-American born=20 >citizens. And Hispanics or those who just look like they might be=20 >Hispanic regardless of citizenship.

    Not to mention a US Marshall now and then.

    And tackling a Senator.

    And the Orange Taco managed to chicken out twice in one day -- once to
    his farming buddies, and once to a man intent on giving Goebbels a run
    for his money -- on the exact same issue.

    But, hey, anything to get his name in the headlines!

    --=20
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- MBSE BBS v1.1.1 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul S Person@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Jun 23 03:02:19 2025
    Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=93The_US_Likely_Has_?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?8_Years=97At_Most=97Bef?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ore_Crisis=94?=

    On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 22:57:20 -0500, Lynn McGuire
    <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 6/21/2025 4:59 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:

    Means testing Medicare will throw a bunch of people like me, middle
    income, into the valley of no health insurance. Throwing us onto
    Obamacare is just another cost to the feddies.
    =20
    Perhaps you might consider eliminating the vast overhead of
    the insurance companies, physician holding companies and
    pharmacy benefits managers that consume better than 50%
    of every healthcare dollar spent. Pure overhead with
    absolutely no benifit.
    =20
    Setup a single payer (perhaps like the post office) and
    simplify the billing infrastructure. Save tons of money.

    What is the biggest Single Payer system on the planet ? Canada with 40=20 >million people ?

    Will that work for 350 million people ?

    BTW, Single Payer is the same as Medicare for all. Given that 67=20
    million people are on Medicare in the USA at the moment, expanding that=20
    to 100% of the citizens may or may not work. Will all doctors accept it=
    =20
    or will they quit / retire ? This would be a heck of an experiment.

    It is strange to see you channeling Bernie and Hillary.

    Medicare for All would still have the various supplemental plans
    available. The Bernie/Hillary solution would not -- you are correct
    about their solution being a single-payer system in Medicare for All
    clothing. But calling it "Medicare for All" does not make it Medicare
    for All.

    This confusion of terms is one reason why I think we need two /new/
    political parties, as both the major parties are simply not working.
    This is more obviously true of the Republicans, dominated by MAGA, but
    the Democrats are failing as well.

    77 million people in the USA are on Medicaid. Given that 3 million=20
    people word for the feddies with an average of two dependents (SWAG) and=
    =20
    1 million work for DOD with an average of two dependents (SWAG). So the=
    =20
    USA government is already covering 67 + 77 + 3 * 3 + 1 * 3 =3D 156 = million=20
    people for healthcare. That is a large portion of the USA population.

    You do realize that State monies are used with Medicaid as well as
    =46ederal, right?

    When I was a kid growing up in Oklahoma in the 1960s, we had free=20
    clinics all over the place. My mother used those extensively for=20
    vaccines and sniffles. Those free clinics seem to have gone away.

    Maybe you should investigate who funded them -- governments or
    non-profit organizations.=20

    BTW, two of the underlying problems are:

    1) The USA does not have a "medical system". It has a "medical
    industry" with a gazillion independent business organizations, each
    trying to maximize profits.

    2) In the USA, "medical insurance" does not exist. The whole /point/
    of insurance is that most of those who pay in never see any payout
    because they never have a covered loss. Even life insurance is based
    on many people paying this year who will not die this year. Yet the
    only success the Republicans had with the ACA has been to reduce the
    penalty for not joining it when young to 0, thus causing it to cease
    to be insurance.

    There may, of course, be others. The heavy reliance on drugs, for
    example.
    --=20
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- MBSE BBS v1.1.1 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul S Person@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Jun 24 01:43:18 2025
    Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=93The_US_Likely_Has_?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?8_Years=97At_Most=97Bef?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ore_Crisis=94?=

    On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 15:04:00 -0700, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

    On 6/22/2025 9:46 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 18:21:29 -0700, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
    =20
    On 6/21/2025 11:57 AM, Lynn McGuire wrote:

    It used to be that we allowed immigration to the USA for college
    graduates and English competency only.

    ROFLMAO

    We still allow about 1.3 million
    people per year to immigrant legally to the USA, mostly family of
    existing citizens.

    Uh, no, ICE is currently arresting and deporting non-American born
    spouses of US citizens. Along with naturalized non-American born
    citizens. And Hispanics or those who just look like they might be
    Hispanic regardless of citizenship.
    =20
    Not to mention a US Marshall now and then.
    =20
    And tackling a Senator.
    =20
    And the Orange Taco managed to chicken out twice in one day -- once to
    his farming buddies, and once to a man intent on giving Goebbels a run
    for his money -- on the exact same issue.
    =20
    But, hey, anything to get his name in the headlines!
    =20
    I knew about the Senator being tackled but I hadn't heard of US=20
    Marshalls being deported.

    One was detained. I don't think he got deported.

    But if they detain every US Marshall who "looks like a Mexican",
    sooner or later they /will/ deport one, since they are so ... sloppy.

    Their superiors ordering them to wear masks isn't doing them any
    favors, BTW. It makes them look like they know they are doing wrong,
    as there is no pandemic and, except for such events as pandemics, only
    people who know they are doing wrong wear masks.
    --=20
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- MBSE BBS v1.1.1 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul S Person@3:633/280.2 to All on Thu Jun 26 01:59:27 2025
    Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=93The_US_Likely_Has_?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?8_Years=97At_Most=97Bef?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ore_Crisis=94?=

    On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 08:53:16 -0700, Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:



    On 6/21/25 11:57, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    On 6/21/2025 11:15 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
    Robert Carnegie=A0 <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> wrote:

    Is the crisis because the OAS fund cannot
    pay elderly SS subscribers due to the government
    pilfering it, or is it because the government
    pilfering has to stop when the money is all gone?

    The government pilfering is a problem, and it's been happening since
    Reagan.

    The aging population is also a problem, with fewer younger people =
    paying
    into the system as more aging people are paid by it.=A0 (And yes, =
    higher
    immigration rates can fix this one.)

    Some people have made the argument that mathematically, if the cap on
    income was removed from the social security witholdings, so that
    billionaires were paying at the same percentage rate as millionaires
    instead of the same amount, that it would solve the current OAS =
    deficit
    problem.=A0 This is true, and it's certainly a good plan from any = viewpoint
    except that of the very rich, but it's also kicking the can down the =
    road
    a bit since eventually the very rich are likely to get paid back a =
    good
    portion of that a generation later.
    --scott
    =20
    Higher immigration will not fix this problem as most of the immigrants=
    =20
    are uneducated and cannot speak the majority language, English.
    =20
    It used to be that we allowed immigration to the USA for college=20
    graduates and English competency only.=A0 We still allow about 1.3 = million=20
    people per year to immigrant legally to the USA, mostly family of=20
    existing citizens.
    =20
    Lynn
    =20

    Lynn you are buying the right wing lies again. Immigrants are pursuing =
    more
    education than ever before...
    Most of the undocumented would not take those jobs that Americans would
    not take if they were totally able to deal with people in English.=20 >Yesterday the
    Father of several Marine sons who is pursuing the immunity due to =
    parents
    of Military was arrested by ICE as he was doing the landscaping at a =
    chain
    restaurant and they accused him of attacking them with a weed wacker =
    when
    he was trying to run away. As usual with ICE they presented no warrant =
    and
    were masked. He just had darker skin.

    Huh.

    I thought Trump ordered all people wearing masks to be arrested.

    So why haven't the alleged ICE Agents wearing masks been -- arrested?

    The excessive focus on "people who look like Mexicans" ("racism") has
    been apparent for quite some time.

    As has their sloppiness and inefficiency.

    The effects of their efforts should be apparent next year at the food
    store and on the kitchen table.

    Well, unless the Orange Taco backs down again.
    --=20
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- MBSE BBS v1.1.1 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul S Person@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Jun 27 01:51:16 2025
    Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=93The_US_Likely_Has_?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?8_Years=97At_Most=97Bef?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ore_Crisis=94?=

    On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:37:48 -0700, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

    On 6/25/2025 8:59 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 08:53:16 -0700, Bobbie Sellers
    <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:
    =20


    On 6/21/25 11:57, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    On 6/21/2025 11:15 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
    Robert Carnegie=A0 <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> wrote:

    Is the crisis because the OAS fund cannot
    pay elderly SS subscribers due to the government
    pilfering it, or is it because the government
    pilfering has to stop when the money is all gone?

    The government pilfering is a problem, and it's been happening =
    since
    Reagan.

    The aging population is also a problem, with fewer younger people = paying
    into the system as more aging people are paid by it.=A0 (And yes, = higher
    immigration rates can fix this one.)

    Some people have made the argument that mathematically, if the cap =
    on
    income was removed from the social security witholdings, so that
    billionaires were paying at the same percentage rate as =
    millionaires
    instead of the same amount, that it would solve the current OAS =
    deficit
    problem.=A0 This is true, and it's certainly a good plan from any = viewpoint
    except that of the very rich, but it's also kicking the can down =
    the road
    a bit since eventually the very rich are likely to get paid back a =
    good
    portion of that a generation later.
    --scott

    Higher immigration will not fix this problem as most of the =
    immigrants
    are uneducated and cannot speak the majority language, English.

    It used to be that we allowed immigration to the USA for college
    graduates and English competency only.=A0 We still allow about 1.3 = million
    people per year to immigrant legally to the USA, mostly family of
    existing citizens.

    Lynn


    Lynn you are buying the right wing lies again. Immigrants are = pursuing more
    education than ever before...
    Most of the undocumented would not take those jobs that Americans = would
    not take if they were totally able to deal with people in English.
    Yesterday the
    Father of several Marine sons who is pursuing the immunity due to =
    parents
    of Military was arrested by ICE as he was doing the landscaping at a = chain
    restaurant and they accused him of attacking them with a weed wacker =
    when
    he was trying to run away. As usual with ICE they presented no =
    warrant and
    were masked. He just had darker skin.
    =20
    Huh.
    =20
    I thought Trump ordered all people wearing masks to be arrested.
    =20
    So why haven't the alleged ICE Agents wearing masks been -- arrested?
    =20
    The excessive focus on "people who look like Mexicans" ("racism") has
    been apparent for quite some time.
    =20
    As has their sloppiness and inefficiency.
    =20
    The effects of their efforts should be apparent next year at the food
    store and on the kitchen table.
    =20
    Or, its already being felt. I've seen a couple of articles about the=20 >disappearance of the lunch trucks (aka Taco Trucks) doing curbside =
    business.

    =46air enough.

    I'm afraid I am so self-centered that I mainly mean "felt by me". As
    in a lack of canned fruit or frozen veggies. So far, so good. Some
    higher prices, but those may have been coming for years given how long
    they were stable.

    But of course others are experiencing negative effects already.
    Businesses that have no employees, farmers that have no field hands,
    small communities whose major employer was a US gummint operation that
    got DOGEd and now has no major employer, soon to be followed by
    economic devastation (on a small town scale) -- I do read about this
    stuff.
    --=20
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- MBSE BBS v1.1.1 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)