On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 10:06:26 -0700, Robert Woodward
<
robertaw@drizzle.com> wrote:
In any bureaucracy, the people devoted to the benefit of the
bureaucracy itself always get in control and those dedicated to
the goals that the bureaucracy is supposed to accomplish have
less and less influence, and sometimes are eliminated entirely.
I am bit more optimistic then he was in that it I am assuming (hoping
that it is possible) that a bureaucracy can be forced to stay focused on >what it is supposed to accomplish. It does require significant effort
from higher authority (who are NEVER selected from the bureaucrats in >question). BTW, if "FIRMLY" requires executing 1% of the bureaucrats
every decade, you must execute that many.
If you read up (or watch Youtube) you would be very depressed about
the British "Quangos" (acronym for "quasi-autonomous non-governmental organizations") particularly the ones engaging in sexually
transitioning pre-pubescents.
"Quasi-autonomous" meaning "paid for by the taxpayer but responsible
to their boards, NOT the public via governments"
--- MBSE BBS v1.1.1 (Linux-x86_64)
* Origin: Easynews - www.easynews.com (3:633/280.2@fidonet)