• [NEWS] Amazon announces new "Stargate" TV series

    From Your Name@3:633/10 to All on Thu Nov 20 10:54:24 2025

    I haven't watched teh video yet, but this is probably another idiotic
    "reboot" with ill-fitting nonsense that ruins the franchise. (Mind you,
    the "Stargate SG-1" series already did that with the various changes it
    made from the original movie.)



    Beloved Sci-Fi Franchise Returns in a Big Way at Amazon,
    Watch Teaser Video
    --------------------------------------------------------
    A new Stargate show is in the works at Amazon MGM Studios.

    Stargate originated as a 1994 movie directed by Roland Emmerich
    that stars Kurt Russell and James Spader. That film spawned a
    franchise that includes three live-action series - Stargate SG-1,
    Stargate Atlantis, and Stargate Universe - among other
    direct-to-DVD movies, animated shows, and more.

    Per The Hollywood Reporter, Amazon has now ordered a brand-new
    Stargate series for Prime Video that will simply be titled
    Stargate. Check out an announcement video for the new show below:

    Annoucement Video (6mins 58secs)
    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e82uV9sBt4I>

    What do we know about Amazon's new Stargate show?
    The new Stargate show comes from creator and showrunner Martin
    Gero, who worked as a writer and producer on the other Stargate
    series.

    "Twenty years ago, my first real job in television was as a story
    editor on?Stargate: Atlantis. I spent five years at the franchise
    working across all three series," Gero said in a statement.
    "Stargate?taught me everything about making television - it's
    written into my DNA. I'm beyond thrilled that Amazon MGM Studios
    has entrusted me with guiding this incredible franchise into its
    next phase. For those who've kept the gate active through
    conventions, rewatches, and unwavering faith - this one's for you.
    And for those that are new to our world, I promise you're in for
    something extraordinary."

    Plot details are being kept under wraps at this time. Gero also
    serves as an executive producer on the new show alongside Emmerich,
    Dead Devlin, Joby Harold, and Tory Tunnell. Brad Wright and Joe
    Mallozzi, both of whom have also been involved in past Stargate
    projects, will be consulting producers.

    "Stargate?is an enduring, iconic franchise that has captivated
    audiences for decades with its bold exploration of humanity's
    place in the cosmos," Amazon MGM Studios' Nick Pepper said. "In
    partnership with our extraordinary creative team of Martin, Tory,
    and Joby, we're honored to open this next gate to bring a visionary
    new chapter of this beloved franchise to our global Prime Video
    audience, one that honors the series' rich legacy while propelling
    it into an ambitious and emotionally resonant future."



    <https://www.comingsoon.net/tv/news/2064926-beloved-sci-fi-franchise-returns-big-way-amazon-watch-teaser-video>






    --- PyGate Linux v1.5
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From s|b@3:633/10 to All on Thu Nov 20 14:17:44 2025
    On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 10:54:24 +1300, Your Name wrote:

    I haven't watched teh video yet, but this is probably another idiotic "reboot" with ill-fitting nonsense that ruins the franchise. (Mind you,
    the "Stargate SG-1" series already did that with the various changes it
    made from the original movie.)

    'Now with even better CGI!'

    Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without being creative).

    --
    s|b

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.1
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Your Name@3:633/10 to All on Fri Nov 21 10:47:03 2025
    On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:
    On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 10:54:24 +1300, Your Name wrote:

    I haven't watched teh video yet, but this is probably another idiotic
    "reboot" with ill-fitting nonsense that ruins the franchise. (Mind you,
    the "Stargate SG-1" series already did that with the various changes it
    made from the original movie.)

    'Now with even better CGI!'

    If only that was going to be the sole changes. Unfortunately it's far
    more likely to have lots of ridiculous changes to suit the new person
    in charge's ego and silly ideas of what it "should" have been, as well
    as appease the Politically Correct quotas and whiners.



    Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without being creative).

    George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade the
    original movies (with Politically Correct changes) and stupidly called
    them a "Sequel Trilogy", plus of course Disney's continual laziness in
    doing 'live-action' remakes of all their animated movies.



    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.1
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@3:633/10 to All on Thu Nov 20 18:15:02 2025
    On 11/20/2025 1:47 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:
    On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 10:54:24 +1300, Your Name wrote:

    I haven't watched teh video yet, but this is probably another idiotic
    "reboot" with ill-fitting nonsense that ruins the franchise. (Mind you,
    the "Stargate SG-1" series already did that with the various changes it
    made from the original movie.)

    'Now with even better CGI!'

    If only that was going to be the sole changes. Unfortunately it's far
    more likely to have lots of ridiculous changes to suit the new person in charge's ego and silly ideas of what it "should" have been, as well as appease the Politically Correct quotas and whiners.



    Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without being creative).

    George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade the
    original movies (with Politically Correct changes) and stupidly called
    them a "Sequel Trilogy", plus of course Disney's continual laziness in
    doing 'live-action' remakes of all their animated movies.

    Uh, no, George "re-edited" the ORIGINAL trilogy and tried to make it the
    only versions available. It did NOT go over well.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.1
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From anim8rfsk@3:633/10 to All on Thu Nov 20 19:24:02 2025
    Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
    On 11/20/2025 1:47 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:
    On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 10:54:24 +1300, Your Name wrote:

    I haven't watched teh video yet, but this is probably another idiotic
    "reboot" with ill-fitting nonsense that ruins the franchise. (Mind you, >>>> the "Stargate SG-1" series already did that with the various changes it >>>> made from the original movie.)

    'Now with even better CGI!'

    If only that was going to be the sole changes. Unfortunately it's far
    more likely to have lots of ridiculous changes to suit the new person in
    charge's ego and silly ideas of what it "should" have been, as well as
    appease the Politically Correct quotas and whiners.



    Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without being creative).

    George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade the
    original movies (with Politically Correct changes) and stupidly called
    them a "Sequel Trilogy", plus of course Disney's continual laziness in
    doing 'live-action' remakes of all their animated movies.

    Uh, no, George "re-edited" the ORIGINAL trilogy and tried to make it the only versions available. It did NOT go over well.


    No ?Episode IV?
    No ?A New Hope?
    No Rontos
    No ?Greedo shot first?!

    --
    The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.1
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Your Name@3:633/10 to All on Fri Nov 21 18:49:35 2025
    On 2025-11-21 02:15:02 +0000, Dimensional Traveler said:
    On 11/20/2025 1:47 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:
    On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 10:54:24 +1300, Your Name wrote:

    I haven't watched teh video yet, but this is probably another idiotic
    "reboot" with ill-fitting nonsense that ruins the franchise. (Mind you, >>>> the "Stargate SG-1" series already did that with the various changes it >>>> made from the original movie.)

    'Now with even better CGI!'

    If only that was going to be the sole changes. Unfortunately it's far
    more likely to have lots of ridiculous changes to suit the new person
    in charge's ego and silly ideas of what it "should" have been, as well
    as appease the Politically Correct quotas and whiners.



    Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without being creative).

    George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade the
    original movies (with Politically Correct changes) and stupidly called
    them a "Sequel Trilogy", plus of course Disney's continual laziness in
    doing 'live-action' remakes of all their animated movies.

    Uh, no, George "re-edited" the ORIGINAL trilogy and tried to make it
    the only versions available. It did NOT go over well.

    But that was "re-creating" it, simply re-editing it to make it how he (apparently) intended it to be in the first place if he had had more
    time, money, and technology. :-)

    Disney re-created it with their lazy "Sequel Trilogy".



    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.1
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Blueshirt@3:633/10 to All on Fri Nov 21 13:36:56 2025

    Dimensional Traveler wrote:

    On 11/20/2025 1:47 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:

    Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without
    being creative).

    George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade
    the original movies (with Politically Correct changes) and
    stupidly called them a "Sequel Trilogy", plus of course
    Disney's continual laziness in doing 'live-action' remakes
    of all their animated movies.

    Uh, no, George "re-edited" the ORIGINAL trilogy and tried
    to make it the only versions available. It did NOT go over
    well.

    Who shot first?! ;-)


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.1
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Blueshirt@3:633/10 to All on Fri Nov 21 13:36:04 2025
    Your Name wrote:

    On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:

    Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without
    being creative).

    George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade
    the original movies (with Politically Correct changes)

    Well, Lucas messed around quite a bit with the original
    movies long before Disney took over the franchise. Some of
    his 'edits' were not very creative or popular. He was constantly
    tinkering with those first three movies... like a small boy that
    has just discovered his willy and can't stop touching it!

    and stupidly called them a "Sequel Trilogy",

    "Sequel Trilogy" was being used in fandom long before Disney
    came
    along. So Disney did not coin that term. (I don't know who did
    though.)

    plus of course Disney's continual laziness in doing 'live-
    action' remakes of all their animated movies.

    Guilty!

    Although for 'live action' read CGI animated... i.e. there were
    no real Lions in "The Lion King" remake (etc.)


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.1
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From BTR1701@3:633/10 to All on Fri Nov 21 20:40:53 2025
    On Nov 21, 2025 at 5:36:04 AM PST, ""Blueshirt"" <blueshirt@indigo.news>
    wrote:

    Your Name wrote:

    On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:

    Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without
    being creative).

    George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade
    the original movies (with Politically Correct changes)

    Well, Lucas messed around quite a bit with the original
    movies long before Disney took over the franchise. Some of
    his 'edits' were not very creative or popular. He was constantly
    tinkering with those first three movies... like a small boy that
    has just discovered his willy and can't stop touching it!

    I've always been bamboozled by Lucas's choice of which scenes to update.

    He left some of the worst SFX shots completely alone, but then took the time
    to insert CGI creatures in the background of scenes that didn't need them, and even changed random insignificant lines from characters, like when Vader prepares to leave Bespin after his fight with Luke. In the original version,
    he says, "Bring my shuttle." In the upgraded version, he says "Alert my star destroyer to prepare for my arrival." Why? How does that change or improve anything? But Lucas took the time to change it.

    And while he's focusing on that irrelevant minutiae, he leaves the shot of the Executor nose-diving into the Death Star in ROTJ untouched, which is just terrible:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETFNSVNQqfE

    A ship larger than the island of Manhattan plunging at speed into the Death Star should have pretty much ended things right then and there. The resulting impact would have torn half the Death Star apart and crippled it. But what we got was a shot of one obvious model miniature crashing into the plastic
    surface of another with a poof of flame shot up from below.

    It's horrible. Even in the 80s as a kid when I saw it for the first time I thought it was horrible. If there's one shot in the entire trilogy that's screaming out to be updated with modern VFX techniques, that's the one. But Lucas ignores it in favor of expanding gas rings and redubbing random lines of dialogue.

    and stupidly called them a "Sequel Trilogy",

    "Sequel Trilogy" was being used in fandom long before Disney
    came along. So Disney did not coin that term. (I don't know who did
    though.)

    plus of course Disney's continual laziness in doing 'live-
    action' remakes of all their animated movies.

    Guilty!

    Although for 'live action' read CGI animated... i.e. there were
    no real Lions in "The Lion King" remake (etc.)




    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.1
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Your Name@3:633/10 to All on Sat Nov 22 10:15:34 2025
    On 2025-11-21 13:36:04 +0000, Blueshirt said:
    Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:

    Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without being creative).

    George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade the
    original movies (with Politically Correct changes)

    Well, Lucas messed around quite a bit with the original movies long
    before Disney took over the franchise. Some of his 'edits' were not
    very creative or popular. He was constantly tinkering with those first
    three movies... like a small boy that has just discovered his willy and can't stop touching it!

    Yes, but the point is Geroge Lucas had the creativity to make the
    movies and (at least from a maker's stance) every right to alter tham
    to his satisfaction. Disney on the other hand showed zero creative
    ability in the "Sequel Trilogy", although some of the TV shows and
    other spin-off movies have been better.



    and stupidly called them a "Sequel Trilogy",

    "Sequel Trilogy" was being used in fandom long before Disney came
    along. So Disney did not coin that term. (I don't know who did though.)

    Disney simply took the original movies and lazily rehashed them with
    extra Politically Correct nonsense. They laughingly called them a
    "Sequel Trilogy", when in reality they were just lazy remakes.

    George Lucas was already working on his own Sequel Trilogy when he sold
    out to Disney. His version was a bit better, although reportedly
    brought back Darth Maul, which is a silly idea, but later re-used for
    the animated series.



    plus of course Disney's continual laziness in doing 'live-action'
    remakes of all their animated movies.

    Guilty!

    Although for 'live action' read CGI animated... i.e. there were no real Lions in "The Lion King" remake (etc.)

    Depends on which remade movie it is. Some are pure CGI and some are CGI
    / live-action mix. There may even be a couple that are all live-action,
    but I've never bothered to watch any of them to know for sure.



    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.1
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From anim8rfsk@3:633/10 to All on Fri Nov 21 21:55:28 2025
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    On Nov 21, 2025 at 5:36:04 AM PST, ""Blueshirt"" <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    Your Name wrote:

    On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:

    Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without
    being creative).

    George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade
    the original movies (with Politically Correct changes)

    Well, Lucas messed around quite a bit with the original
    movies long before Disney took over the franchise. Some of
    his 'edits' were not very creative or popular. He was constantly
    tinkering with those first three movies... like a small boy that
    has just discovered his willy and can't stop touching it!

    I've always been bamboozled by Lucas's choice of which scenes to update.

    He left some of the worst SFX shots completely alone, but then took the time to insert CGI creatures in the background of scenes that didn't need them, and
    even changed random insignificant lines from characters, like when Vader prepares to leave Bespin after his fight with Luke. In the original version, he says, "Bring my shuttle." In the upgraded version, he says "Alert my star destroyer to prepare for my arrival." Why? How does that change or improve anything? But Lucas took the time to change it.

    And while he's focusing on that irrelevant minutiae, he leaves the shot of the
    Executor nose-diving into the Death Star in ROTJ untouched, which is just terrible:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETFNSVNQqfE

    A ship larger than the island of Manhattan plunging at speed into the Death Star should have pretty much ended things right then and there. The resulting impact would have torn half the Death Star apart and crippled it. But what we got was a shot of one obvious model miniature crashing into the plastic surface of another with a poof of flame shot up from below.

    It's horrible. Even in the 80s as a kid when I saw it for the first time I thought it was horrible. If there's one shot in the entire trilogy that's screaming out to be updated with modern VFX techniques, that's the one. But Lucas ignores it in favor of expanding gas rings

    Yeah, let?s add Praxis waves to everything.

    Producers would always ask for that, so much that software packages
    actually had a button for it marked BSR which stood for ?big stupid ring?

    I am amazed that spellcheck actually knew what I meant by ?Praxis wave? and spelled it correctly

    and redubbing random lines of
    dialogue.

    and stupidly called them a "Sequel Trilogy",

    "Sequel Trilogy" was being used in fandom long before Disney
    came along. So Disney did not coin that term. (I don't know who did
    though.)

    plus of course Disney's continual laziness in doing 'live-
    action' remakes of all their animated movies.

    Guilty!

    Although for 'live action' read CGI animated... i.e. there were
    no real Lions in "The Lion King" remake (etc.)







    --
    The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.1
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)