I haven't watched teh video yet, but this is probably another idiotic "reboot" with ill-fitting nonsense that ruins the franchise. (Mind you,
the "Stargate SG-1" series already did that with the various changes it
made from the original movie.)
On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 10:54:24 +1300, Your Name wrote:
I haven't watched teh video yet, but this is probably another idiotic
"reboot" with ill-fitting nonsense that ruins the franchise. (Mind you,
the "Stargate SG-1" series already did that with the various changes it
made from the original movie.)
'Now with even better CGI!'
Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without being creative).
On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 10:54:24 +1300, Your Name wrote:
I haven't watched teh video yet, but this is probably another idiotic
"reboot" with ill-fitting nonsense that ruins the franchise. (Mind you,
the "Stargate SG-1" series already did that with the various changes it
made from the original movie.)
'Now with even better CGI!'
If only that was going to be the sole changes. Unfortunately it's far
more likely to have lots of ridiculous changes to suit the new person in charge's ego and silly ideas of what it "should" have been, as well as appease the Politically Correct quotas and whiners.
Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without being creative).
George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade the
original movies (with Politically Correct changes) and stupidly called
them a "Sequel Trilogy", plus of course Disney's continual laziness in
doing 'live-action' remakes of all their animated movies.
On 11/20/2025 1:47 PM, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:Uh, no, George "re-edited" the ORIGINAL trilogy and tried to make it the only versions available. It did NOT go over well.
On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 10:54:24 +1300, Your Name wrote:
I haven't watched teh video yet, but this is probably another idiotic
"reboot" with ill-fitting nonsense that ruins the franchise. (Mind you, >>>> the "Stargate SG-1" series already did that with the various changes it >>>> made from the original movie.)
'Now with even better CGI!'
If only that was going to be the sole changes. Unfortunately it's far
more likely to have lots of ridiculous changes to suit the new person in
charge's ego and silly ideas of what it "should" have been, as well as
appease the Politically Correct quotas and whiners.
Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without being creative).
George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade the
original movies (with Politically Correct changes) and stupidly called
them a "Sequel Trilogy", plus of course Disney's continual laziness in
doing 'live-action' remakes of all their animated movies.
On 11/20/2025 1:47 PM, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 10:54:24 +1300, Your Name wrote:
I haven't watched teh video yet, but this is probably another idiotic
"reboot" with ill-fitting nonsense that ruins the franchise. (Mind you, >>>> the "Stargate SG-1" series already did that with the various changes it >>>> made from the original movie.)
'Now with even better CGI!'
If only that was going to be the sole changes. Unfortunately it's far
more likely to have lots of ridiculous changes to suit the new person
in charge's ego and silly ideas of what it "should" have been, as well
as appease the Politically Correct quotas and whiners.
Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without being creative).
George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade the
original movies (with Politically Correct changes) and stupidly called
them a "Sequel Trilogy", plus of course Disney's continual laziness in
doing 'live-action' remakes of all their animated movies.
Uh, no, George "re-edited" the ORIGINAL trilogy and tried to make it
the only versions available. It did NOT go over well.
On 11/20/2025 1:47 PM, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:
Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without
being creative).
George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade
the original movies (with Politically Correct changes) and
stupidly called them a "Sequel Trilogy", plus of course
Disney's continual laziness in doing 'live-action' remakes
of all their animated movies.
Uh, no, George "re-edited" the ORIGINAL trilogy and tried
to make it the only versions available. It did NOT go over
well.
On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:
Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without
being creative).
George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade
the original movies (with Politically Correct changes)
and stupidly called them a "Sequel Trilogy",
plus of course Disney's continual laziness in doing 'live-
action' remakes of all their animated movies.
Your Name wrote:
On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:
Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without
being creative).
George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade
the original movies (with Politically Correct changes)
Well, Lucas messed around quite a bit with the original
movies long before Disney took over the franchise. Some of
his 'edits' were not very creative or popular. He was constantly
tinkering with those first three movies... like a small boy that
has just discovered his willy and can't stop touching it!
and stupidly called them a "Sequel Trilogy",
"Sequel Trilogy" was being used in fandom long before Disney
came along. So Disney did not coin that term. (I don't know who did
though.)
plus of course Disney's continual laziness in doing 'live-
action' remakes of all their animated movies.
Guilty!
Although for 'live action' read CGI animated... i.e. there were
no real Lions in "The Lion King" remake (etc.)
Your Name wrote:
On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:
Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without being creative).
George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade the
original movies (with Politically Correct changes)
Well, Lucas messed around quite a bit with the original movies long
before Disney took over the franchise. Some of his 'edits' were not
very creative or popular. He was constantly tinkering with those first
three movies... like a small boy that has just discovered his willy and can't stop touching it!
and stupidly called them a "Sequel Trilogy",
"Sequel Trilogy" was being used in fandom long before Disney came
along. So Disney did not coin that term. (I don't know who did though.)
plus of course Disney's continual laziness in doing 'live-action'
remakes of all their animated movies.
Guilty!
Although for 'live action' read CGI animated... i.e. there were no real Lions in "The Lion King" remake (etc.)
On Nov 21, 2025 at 5:36:04 AM PST, ""Blueshirt"" <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Your Name wrote:
On 2025-11-20 13:17:44 +0000, s|b said:
Feels like George Lucas recreating 'Star Wars' (without
being creative).
George Lucas was creative ... it's Disney that lazily remade
the original movies (with Politically Correct changes)
Well, Lucas messed around quite a bit with the original
movies long before Disney took over the franchise. Some of
his 'edits' were not very creative or popular. He was constantly
tinkering with those first three movies... like a small boy that
has just discovered his willy and can't stop touching it!
I've always been bamboozled by Lucas's choice of which scenes to update.
He left some of the worst SFX shots completely alone, but then took the time to insert CGI creatures in the background of scenes that didn't need them, and
even changed random insignificant lines from characters, like when Vader prepares to leave Bespin after his fight with Luke. In the original version, he says, "Bring my shuttle." In the upgraded version, he says "Alert my star destroyer to prepare for my arrival." Why? How does that change or improve anything? But Lucas took the time to change it.
And while he's focusing on that irrelevant minutiae, he leaves the shot of the
Executor nose-diving into the Death Star in ROTJ untouched, which is just terrible:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETFNSVNQqfE
A ship larger than the island of Manhattan plunging at speed into the Death Star should have pretty much ended things right then and there. The resulting impact would have torn half the Death Star apart and crippled it. But what we got was a shot of one obvious model miniature crashing into the plastic surface of another with a poof of flame shot up from below.
It's horrible. Even in the 80s as a kid when I saw it for the first time I thought it was horrible. If there's one shot in the entire trilogy that's screaming out to be updated with modern VFX techniques, that's the one. But Lucas ignores it in favor of expanding gas rings
dialogue.
and stupidly called them a "Sequel Trilogy",
"Sequel Trilogy" was being used in fandom long before Disney
came along. So Disney did not coin that term. (I don't know who did
though.)
plus of course Disney's continual laziness in doing 'live-
action' remakes of all their animated movies.
Guilty!
Although for 'live action' read CGI animated... i.e. there were
no real Lions in "The Lion King" remake (etc.)
| Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| Users: | 14 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 143:49:02 |
| Calls: | 182 |
| Files: | 21,502 |
| Messages: | 80,704 |