In article <MPG.430bcb146df1a47298982e@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107t87g$2nqf$17@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
I imagine the Watcher turning up, and Nyssa saying that she's happy to
go with him but just needs to pack a few things first... and the Watcher >stands there like "WTF? This has never happened before," but his face >glows so Nyssa can't tell.
Just that how did the Watcher get to Traken then Logopolis.
Perhaps the simplest way to think of Watchers is as a sort of overlap >between reincarnations. Ideally one incarnation should appear as the >previous one fades, almost like a phoenix, but better an overlap than a >gap.
But ony 1 TARDIs.
Verily, in article <107vebs$1bek$11@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
But ony 1 TARDIs.
TARDISes don't regenerate, no matter what RTD implied in "The
Giggle."
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <107vebs$1bek$11@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
But ony 1 TARDIs.
TARDISes don't regenerate, no matter what RTD implied in "The
Giggle."
I think the term is bi-generate... as there became two of
them... one of them even had a wheelchair ramp... the one
that was created by the bang of a big hammer... how great
was that?
Verily, in article <xn0p9p7pj7r6dcd001@post.eweka.nl>, did blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <107vebs$1bek$11@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
But ony 1 TARDIs.
TARDISes don't regenerate, no matter what RTD implied in "The
Giggle."
I think the term is bi-generate... as there became two of
them... one of them even had a wheelchair ramp... the one
that was created by the bang of a big hammer... how great
was that?
I don't quite understand how "bigeneration" makes another TARDIS. I
don't think RTD did either, frankly.
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0p9p7pj7r6dcd001@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <107vebs$1bek$11@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
But ony 1 TARDIs.
TARDISes don't regenerate, no matter what RTD implied in
"The Giggle."
I think the term is bi-generate... as there became two of
them... one of them even had a wheelchair ramp... the one
that was created by the bang of a big hammer... how great
was that?
I don't quite understand how "bigeneration" makes another
TARDIS. I don't think RTD did either, frankly.
Everyone's a cynic! I'm sure in RTD's world if you can create
two Doctor's from one Doctor by pulling one out of the other's
body, and that makes sense to you... then [bang a hammer and]
creating a second TARDIS is just as rational... it's fantasy
writing 101. (aka making it up as you go along.)
:-)
Patially.
You illiterate fuckwit.
https://postimg.cc/YvcdRMFx
Verily, in article <185d3d51bed07c3f$33175$1592711 $64dd6e6a@news.thecubenet.com>, did rudy.can@jllkone.not deliver unto us
this message:
>
You illiterate fuckwit.
https://postimg.cc/YvcdRMFx
That could not look any faker if you went over it with an electric make- it-look-fake machine.
Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
---|---|
Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
Users: | 11 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 48:00:50 |
Calls: | 166 |
Files: | 21,502 |
Messages: | 77,697 |