<Esc>:read /proc/version
Linux version 6.6.6 (root@bitskii) (gcc (GCC) 13.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.41) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Dec 11 19:18:44 UTC 2023
No surprise(s) ... yet.
No surprise(s) ... yet.
<Esc>:read /proc/version
Linux version 6.6.6 (root@bitskii) (gcc (GCC) 13.2.0, GNU ld (GNU
Binutils) 2.41) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Dec 11 19:18:44 UTC 2023
No surprise(s) ... yet.
I may skip this version, just because you amped it up so well and got me scared. ;)
I may skip this version, just because you amped it up so well and got me
scared. ;)
I had the same thought.. ;)
It's building now so we'll see what we get.
No surprise(s) ... yet.
we'll be upgrading again in a week or so. ;)
Linux version 6.6.6-arch1-1 (linux@archlinux)
(gcc (GCC) 13.2.1 20230801
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.41.0)
#1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:48:23 +0000
I'm testing this on you with half-witty replies.
Linux version 6.6.6-arch1-1 (linux@archlinux)
(gcc (GCC) 13.2.1 20230801
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.41.0)
#1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:48:23 +0000
Are these the four lines in question? Looks good from this angle.
If I got the previous reply correct - the split four lines of output from /proc/version - then your template appears to be as retro as it can get without breaking anything. I think you could easily lose most of the kludges though but I am a tad biased when it comes to those damn things.
Should be back in action now.
I don't see anything of value in Synchonet.
What a small world you must live in
If you say so. To be honest, your nanao fix was vastly more impressive than anything I've seen from Synchonet. I don't see anything of value
in Synchonet.
Eh, to each their own. I enjoy it.
glibc comes to mind. Is that the one that takes anywhere from 2
to 10 hours to compile depending on hardware?) :)
Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
---|---|
Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
Users: | 5 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 34:48:56 |
Calls: | 56 |
Files: | 21,500 |
Messages: | 69,360 |