1. Forum
  2. Fidonet
  3. IPV6

  • Route48

    From Benny Pedersen@2:230/0 to Michiel van der Vlist on Sun Mar 26 17:17:40 2023
    Hello Michiel!

    23 Mar 2023 19:56, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to All:

    MvdV> Rumour has is that Route48 is closing down. I wonder how this will
    MvdV> affect Fidonet. Especially net 134. The majority of nodes in net 134
    MvdV> uses a tunnel from Route48.

    is microsoft still supporting ppp0 devices ? :)

    my point is tunnel is not that bad, or its just more complicated to
    still use, more and more uses non tunnel setups, to make it more
    simple, what is not desired is that all bots try
    port 21 22 23 25 80 109 110 143 443 465 587 993 995, with all
    kinds of random username and passwords, thay sometimes
    succed, sadly world to live in


    Regards Benny

    ... too late to die young :)

    --- Msged/LNX 6.1.2 (Linux/6.2.6-gentoo-dist (x86_64))
    * Origin: gopher://fido.junc.eu/ (2:230/0)
  • From Victor Sudakov@2:5005/49 to Michiel van der Vlist on Mon Apr 3 15:23:00 2023
    Dear Michiel,

    24 Mar 23 14:39, you wrote to Tommi Koivula:


    It would be a nice day when these tunnel provider were no longer
    needed because we all could get native IPv6 from our regular ISP.

    Hear, hear!

    Still no luck with any federal providers here in Tomsk. Rumour has it some of them can offer you some kind of tunnel (maybe its available for business customers), but noone is offering anything as simple as native IPv6 on my router's Ethernet interface.

    Against this background, the "MTS" mobile operator is advanced. I have a native IPv6 address from them on my Android phone (alongside with a RFC1918 IPv4 address).

    Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
    --- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20170303-b20170303
    * Origin: Ulthar (2:5005/49)
  • From Victor Sudakov@2:5005/49 to Tommi Koivula on Mon Apr 3 15:28:16 2023
    Dear Tommi,

    24 Mar 23 18:22, you wrote to Michiel van der Vlist:


    >> Route48? Frankly I know very little about them. But whatever
    their
    >> bussines model was, it apparently didn't work...

    TK> Don't know about business model, but route48 was nice because
    they
    TK> offered tunnel by wireguard. Wireguard doesn't need public
    ipv4.

    I am not familiar with Wireguard.

    One of the best available VPN software. I have a wireguard server
    running at home for remote access.

    See https://www.wireguard.com/

    It has a major drawback as compared to GRE or IPIP. You cannot bind your side of the tunnel to a specific IP address (external address as related to the tunnel).

    Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
    --- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20170303-b20170303
    * Origin: Ulthar (2:5005/49)
  • From Alexey Vissarionov@2:5020/545 to Victor Sudakov on Tue Apr 4 02:08:08 2023
    Good ${greeting_time}, Victor!

    03 Apr 2023 15:28:16, you wrote to Tommi Koivula:

    I am not familiar with Wireguard.
    One of the best available VPN software. I have a wireguard server
    running at home for remote access. See https://www.wireguard.com/
    It has a major drawback as compared to GRE or IPIP. You cannot bind
    your side of the tunnel to a specific IP address (external address
    as related to the tunnel).

    Whether you need to set up multiple tunnels with different links (I guess this is the case), you may use VRF to keep them apart.

    Linux does that just fine.


    --
    Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin
    gremlin.ru!gremlin; +vii-cmiii-ccxxix-lxxix-xlii

    ... :wq!
    --- /bin/vi
    * Origin: ::1 (2:5020/545)
  • From Victor Sudakov@2:5005/49 to Alexey Vissarionov on Tue Apr 4 11:50:12 2023
    Dear Alexey,

    04 Apr 23 02:08, you wrote to me:

    I am not familiar with Wireguard.
    One of the best available VPN software. I have a wireguard
    server running at home for remote access. See
    https://www.wireguard.com/
    It has a major drawback as compared to GRE or IPIP. You cannot
    bind your side of the tunnel to a specific IP address (external
    address as related to the tunnel).

    Whether you need to set up multiple tunnels with different links (I
    guess this is the case), you may use VRF to keep them apart.

    Linux does that just fine.

    Yes, I implied a case with two upstream ISPs when you want two tunnels to pass via different ISPs.

    I'm sure there exist some clever solutions, but with GRE or IPIP you could just use simple policy routing because the external src address is fixed.

    Do you suggest placing the two upstream ISPs into different VRFs?

    Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
    --- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20170303-b20170303
    * Origin: Ulthar (2:5005/49)
  • From blade@1:134/303 to Wilfred van Velzen on Mon Jun 5 22:11:05 2023
    1:134/303 bbs.canerduh.com:24554 2604:3d09:227b:26af:19:a08b:78ab:5e16 Error: Connection timed out 1:134/303 bbs.canerduh.com:24554 24.64.95.197 Ok.

    My sincere apologies for not noticing this sooner. Firewall was mis-configured on the binkp port.

    For what it's worth, IPv6 should be working on my BBS again.

    Travis

    ... I think I am, therefore, I am... I think.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Raspberry Pi/32)
    * Origin: CaNerDUH BBS (1:134/303)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to blade on Tue Jun 6 08:37:32 2023
    Hi blade,

    On 2023-06-05 22:11:05, you wrote to me:

    1:134/303 bbs.canerduh.com:24554
    2604:3d09:227b:26af:19:a08b:78ab:5e16 Error: Connection timed out
    1:134/303 bbs.canerduh.com:24554 24.64.95.197 Ok.

    My sincere apologies for not noticing this sooner. Firewall was mis-configured on the binkp port.

    For what it's worth, IPv6 should be working on my BBS again.

    That is great to hear!

    Travis

    "Travis Blade" ? ;)


    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.2.0.0
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)