• work at the post office when ...

    From August Abolins@1:153/757.21 to Rob Mccart on Mon Apr 7 09:55:00 2025
    Hello Rob!

    ** On Sunday 06.04.25 - 01:43, Rob Mccart wrote to AARON THOMAS:

    Ha.. On a somewhat unrelated line.. I once applied for
    work at the post office when they had a hiring blitz going
    on. I figured it was a relatively stable job with good pay
    and benefits, but the hiring process was pretty extreme
    with I.Q. and Psyche tests required. I later heard back
    from them and was told that I was not suited for the job
    because I'd scored too high on the I.Q. tests.

    There was probably a message in there somewhere.. B)

    I think they are factoring in likelyhood of turnaround with
    that one. If the candidate scores higher, that probably means
    they will get disatisfied with the job sooner and quit, which
    would cost the company downtime and expense to hire a
    replacement.

    So.. for basic, repetative, meanial jobs that don't require
    critical thinking, they want people who are satisfied with
    routine and doing same-old stuff every day without complaints.

    I worked at the post office as a summer student in my last year
    of high-school. When minimum wage was around $6, I was getting
    $11.01 (yep.. there was an extra $.01 !!! in the contract!)
    First, I was intended to be part-time, and on-call. But after
    a couple of weeks I was in there every day.

    I don't remember if there was an IQ test.

    My main task was running the watermark machine for standard
    letter-size mail, and stashing the mailboxes. But when things
    got less busy, there was always something to keep tidy or
    sweep, or help load and unload the vehicles at the loading
    dock. I didn't mind the work, but I couldn't see myself having
    a "career" doing that stuff for the rest of my life.





    --
    ../|ug

    --- OpenXP 5.0.64
    * Origin: My Westcoast Point (1:153/757.21)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to AUGUST ABOLINS on Mon Apr 7 02:01:00 2025
    A 4 year course to grade 12 where you took those technical courses
    like auto repair and electronics..

    Then there was the 5 year course to grade 13 with more complex maths
    and sciences to prep you for University.

    Normally you didn't take classes from both of those but I decided
    I wanted to and they cursed me trying to sort out a schedule that
    would let me do it, but it was worked out in the end..

    That's pretty clever actually. I took the "normal" route of
    >classes to gr 13 to qualify for university, but I squeezed in
    >one tech/electrical course which I thought would be fun - and
    >it was!

    Yes, it can come in handy.. I also took Machine Shop and while the
    rest of the class were making a Vice, I kept talking the teacher
    into letting me make custom parts for a motorcycle I was building..
    Then one day I realized the term was nearly over that I had barely
    started working on the Vice that we were to be graded on..

    I went to the teacher freaking out over maybe getting a zero for
    the term and he laughed and said I was there to learn the machines
    and I was using more different devices than the rest of the class
    and not to worry about it.. He gave me a mark in the upper 80's..

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * When you meet people, make it clear you're sizing them up
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to AUGUST ABOLINS on Thu Apr 10 00:32:00 2025
    on. I figured it was a relatively stable job with good pay
    and benefits, but the hiring process was pretty extreme
    with I.Q. and Psyche tests required. I later heard back
    from them and was told that I was not suited for the job
    because I'd scored too high on the I.Q. tests.

    I think they are factoring in likelyhood of turnaround with
    >that one. If the candidate scores higher, that probably means
    >they will get disatisfied with the job sooner and quit, which
    >would cost the company downtime and expense to hire a
    >replacement.

    Yes, they actually mentioned that at the time. I don't know if
    I would have been able to do a simple job all day for years or
    not. Maybe I could and I'd have more challenging things I'd get
    into after work. At the time a reliable paycheque and good
    benefits sounded great to me. I figure you don't have to like
    your job, and probably the number of people who do are in the
    minority of workers. Most I think just do their jobs and can't
    wait to get out of there at the end of the day.

    That said, virually all jobs I've ever had that lasted for any
    length of time, I usually ended up being moved or promoted into
    a different job before too long, and usually the new position
    was more challenging.

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Strive to be politically perfect, not just correct
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)