Nvidia boss Jensen Huang steers Trump, Congress against AI chip limits and state-level AI rules

Date:
Fri, 05 Dec 2025 01:30:00 +0000

Description:
Nvidias Jensen Huang successfully lobbied Trump and lawmakers against a proposed AI chip export rule and issued a warning about fragmented state regulation of AI.

FULL STORY

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang isnt known for wading into the political fray, but
this week, he made an exception with some quality time in Washington, DC. He met with President Trump to argue against the GAIN AI Act and its proposed
rule requiring U.S. chipmakers like Nvidia and AMD to prioritize domestic buyers before selling advanced AI chips abroad.

The act was pitched as a way to keep America ahead of China in the AI race,
but it was not long after he met with the president that lawmakers removed it from the National Defense Authorization Act. Huang hastened to proclaim his support for export controls, just not this one.

The GAIN AI Act is even more detrimental to the United States than the AI Diffusion Act, Huang said in a press conference after the meeting. He called
it wise that lawmakers are backing away from the plan.

For Nvidia, which is the undisputed global heavyweight in AI hardware, that kind of disruption would be like asking Boeing to fly with half an engine. Their chips already dominate cloud computing and generative AI development worldwide. Losing the freedom to sell to vetted international customers
without a government-imposed queue would erode their edge in a business built on speed and scale.

Though Huang gave his corporate lobbying a patriotic veneer, he did point to more than just Nvidias bottom line as a reason to oppose the GAIN AI Act. The law would have forced companies like Nvidia to delay foreign chip orders
while confirming there was no outstanding demand in the U.S. But giving American institutions and companies a fair shot at high-end AI chips ahead of foreign markets would, he claimed, slow innovation for rivals as well, complicate global logistics, and damage Americas ability to stay competitive
in AI.

For most people, the impact of these legislative debates is indirect, but
very real. If Huange is right, the regulatory bottleneck would slow the pace
of AI improvements for everyone. Although if he's wrong, it will make it
harder for American businesses to compete if foreign groups can nab all of
the most powerful chips.

Patchwork AI rules

That wasn't Huang's only legislative foe this week. He met with lawmakers to criticize a separate idea gaining traction among U.S. states: local AI regulation. State-by-state AI regulation would drag this industry into a
halt, Huang warned. It would create a national security concern.

If AI laws start diverging wildly across California, Texas, New York, and
every other state, it could create a compliance nightmare for developers. Imagine needing to tweak your chatbots features depending on which zip code your user lives in. Bills are circulating in at least 30 states that propose different standards for disclosure, bias, transparency, and safety in AI systems.

Trump reportedly echoed Huangs concern during their meeting and has publicly backed the idea of a national standard that would override state laws. So
far, the NDAA doesn't have that kind of rule, but if it becomes a real
problem, it might end up in the bill next year.

To tech critics, this is familiar territory: Big Tech pushing for a single federal rule to avoid dealing with 50 regulatory headaches. And it's not as though the regulatory friction might not annoy the average AI user. It would
be like 50 different versions of the GDPR, but without any way to fully
comply.

The shelving of the GAIN AI Act is, depending on your point of view, a signal that lawmakers arent ready to clip the wings of Americas most important chip company, or that they are in thrall to powerful and rich corporate interests. Or both. And while the future of AI regulation at every level is still in
flux, Huang has outlined what techs most powerful players envision as the
ideal solution.

If you use AI tools, or will soon, this matters. Its not just about export forms and legal frameworks. Its about who gets to move fast, who gets slowed down, and how much trust were placing in a handful of companies to shape the technological infrastructure of the next decade.

======================================================================
Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/nvidia-boss-jensen-huang-ste ers-trump-congress-against-ai-chip-limits-and-state-level-ai-rules

$$
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)