I think if constexpr should be extended in a way that the not compiled
branch is only syntactically analyzed but not semantically; currently
this holds true only for generic code. With that you could have opera-
tions that are only meaningful if that branch is actually compiled.
Am 17.07.25 um 14:41 schrieb Bonita Montero:
I think if constexpr should be extended in a way that the not compiled
branch is only syntactically analyzed but not semantically; currently
this holds true only for generic code. With that you could have opera-
tions that are only meaningful if that branch is actually compiled.
-v
Do you have an example, that is _not_ working with the current implementation?
Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
---|---|
Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
Users: | 11 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 50:06:38 |
Calls: | 166 |
Files: | 21,502 |
Messages: | 77,727 |