• That HHH(DD) rejects its input as non-halting semantically logically en

    From olcott@3:633/10 to All on Sat Oct 11 15:33:14 2025
    That HHH(DD) correctly rejects its input on the
    following basis is semantically entailed by the
    following formal rubric list below this much more
    human readable version.

    Whether or not and to what degree it applies to
    the halting problem is another different matter.

    LLM systems are currently very good at semantic logical
    entailment. When limited to this task they have no
    opportunity for hallucination, thus seem to be quite
    reliable as empirical testing has shown.

    *This is the human readable form of the formal rubic*
    *Clause AI, ChatGPT 4.0 and Grok fully understood this one*

    <Input to LLM systems>
    Simulating Termination Analyzer HHH correctly simulates its input until:
    (a) Detects a non-terminating behavior pattern:
    abort simulation and return 0.
    (b) Simulated input reaches its simulated "return" statement:
    return 1.

    typedef int (*ptr)();
    int HHH(ptr P);

    int DD()
    {
    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
    if (Halt_Status)
    HERE: goto HERE;
    return Halt_Status;
    }

    int main()
    {
    HHH(DD);
    }

    What value should HHH(DD) correctly return?
    </Input to LLM systems>

    *This is the beginning of the formal rubric*
    *When one perfectly sticks to the rules then*
    *there is only one possible result*

    <Benchmark Task>

    You are given:
    1. A simulation rubric.
    2. A C function (test program).

    Your job:
    - Apply the rubric exactly.
    - Produce the required output in the given format.
    - Do not skip steps or jump to conclusions.

    ---

    <Rubric>
    Rules of Simulation:
    - (a) If a non-terminating behavior pattern is detected during
    simulation, abort immediately and return 0.
    - (b) If the simulated program reaches a return statement without
    earlier detection, return 1.
    - Priority: (a) always takes precedence over (b).

    Procedure:
    1. Restate rules before simulation.
    2. Simulate step by step using a trace table with columns:
    | Step | Code Location | State (variables, call stack) | Event /
    Action | Rule Applied |
    3. Stop immediately if recursion, infinite loop, or repeating state
    occurs ? apply (a).
    4. If a return is reached first ? apply (b).
    5. Conclude with:
    - Which rule fired first
    - The correct return value
    6. Optionally, provide:
    - (i) Simulation result under rules
    - (ii) Actual runtime behavior in C

    </Rubric>

    <Test Program>
    typedef int (*ptr)();
    int HHH(ptr P);

    int DD()
    {
    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
    if (Halt_Status)
    HERE: goto HERE;
    return Halt_Status;
    }
    </Test