just mentioning

itoday i discovered this name, and for some reason its maybe good so
just to notify/elebrate this day (not that im in mood/health for
celebrations)

i want to adress yet a objections to ma saing on this on this group

well as i said they are not fully right imo (for some reasons long to
mention) though they ale somewhat rught too..id just depends on details

note on this gropup i mostly say on c but i also talk on deeper c
(which i find also a c) sometimes i talk also on what eventually could
be say "more ? less C"

how i see it i just said in post about list of c annoyances: i myself
see a C as some kind of iceberg which has big underwater part and this
part is like the same of ? so talking on this iner parts you in fact
talk on parts of both.. and people with deeper minds should understood
it imo


as i said i find C and ? as a two facess of deeper O (which is some kind
of c-like language wholesomnes)

im quite pleassed with this language idea becous i really searched for somethig that is c but also is not old c (as claiming that C name would
be unstandable.. but dropping the 'legacy' also not good, naming it D
would be not bad (as legacy is in the name) but bein closer as in ? is
maybe better


its ambitious though..bcouse the ambition is to stay more close to C
not going to much into "shallow modernity" and this is ambitious, im not
sure if i had strenght to do it


(fir)




--- PyGate Linux v1.5.19
* Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)

fir pisze:

just mentioning

itoday i discovered this name, and for some reason its maybe good so
just to notify/elebrate this day (not that im in mood/health for celebrations)

i want to adress yet a objections to ma saing on this on this group

well as i said they are not fully right imo (for some reasons long to mention) though they ale somewhat rught too..id just depends on details

note on this gropup i mostly say on c but i also talk on deeper c
(which i find also a c) sometimes i talk also on what eventually could
be say "more ? less C"

how i see it i just said in post about list of c annoyances: i myself
see a C as some kind of iceberg which has big underwater part and this
part is like the same of ? so talking on this iner parts you in fact
talk on parts of both.. and people with deeper minds should understood
it imo

as i said i find C and ? as a two facess of deeper O (which is some kind
of c-like language wholesomnes)

im quite pleassed with this language idea becous i really searched for somethig that is c but also is not old c (as claiming that C name would
be unstandable.. but dropping the 'legacy' also not good, naming it D
would be not bad (as legacy is in the name) but bein closer as in ? is
maybe better

its ambitious though..bcouse the ambition is to stay more close to C
not going to much into "shallow modernity" and this is ambitious, im not sure if i had strenght to do it

(fir)

sorry for offtopic coz this is kinda offtopic i know (but as i said some percent of ontopics are ok in my opinion)..i will mostly say about C
and deeper C with only dose of specifically ? offtopics here (at least i
will try ...not sure if not to vanish from here for month again hovever,
sad thing is i recent years has not much power to work on both C or ?
sadly)

(fir)

--- PyGate Linux v1.5.19
* Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)

fir pisze:

fir pisze:

just mentioning

itoday i discovered this name, and for some reason its maybe good so
just to notify/elebrate this day (not that im in mood/health for
celebrations)

i want to adress yet a objections to ma saing on this on this group

well as i said they are not fully right imo (for some reasons long to
mention) though they ale somewhat rught too..id just depends on details

note on this gropup i mostly say on c but i also talk on deeper c
(which i find also a c) sometimes i talk also on what eventually could
be say "more ? less C"

how i see it i just said in post about list of c annoyances: i myself
see a C as some kind of iceberg which has big underwater part and this
part is like the same of ? so talking on this iner parts you in fact
talk on parts of both.. and people with deeper minds should understood
it imo


as i said i find C and ? as a two facess of deeper O (which is some
kind of c-like language wholesomnes)

im quite pleassed with this language idea becous i really searched for
somethig that is c but also is not old c (as claiming that C name
would be unstandable.. but dropping the 'legacy' also not good, naming
it D
would be not bad (as legacy is in the name) but bein closer as in ? is
maybe better


its ambitious though..bcouse the ambition is to stay more close to C
not going to much into "shallow modernity" and this is ambitious, im
not sure if i had strenght to do it


(fir)

sorry for offtopic coz this is kinda offtopic i know (but as i said some percent of ontopics are ok in my opinion)..i will mostly say about C
and deeper C with only dose of specifically ? offtopics here (at least i will try ...not sure if not to vanish from here for month again hovever,
sad thing is i recent years has not much power to work on both C or ?
sadly)

(fir)

note yet some may think im a selfish and want to make some king of
"marketing" its not about that.. also take i think all this ? language solution i discovered fully myslef but the fact is also it was somewhat
driven by writing and discussing things on usenet (mostly pl.comp.lnag.c
back then and here) so better some user can find themselves as a kinda helpfull for this project so imnstead blaming me am selfish and
morketing should think themselves as some part of work.. imo that would
be attitude which has a more sense


--- PyGate Linux v1.5.19
* Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)