Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?B?4oCcVGhl?= Pulse #134: Stack overflow is almost
=?UTF-8?B?ZGVhZOKAnQ==?=
Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes:
On Wed, 21 May 2025 07:40:31 -0400, Sam wrote:
It's not the LLM or AI that made Stackoverflow jump the shark. They
simply failed to achieve sufficient mind share to be able to withstand
the natural factors that work to collapse every social media platform
that employs content moderation.
I was answering question and gaining points on there for a while, until I realized that the points themselves didn’t mean anything (beyond conveying some kind of status on the site itself). I kind of lost interest after
that.
I think my account is still there, and my answers are still accumulating points ...
There's a very telling footnote in one of the FAQs over there. I don't have the direct link because, well, I couldn't care less, but the FAQ entry wrote about a cryptic reason for a loss of reputation points that says something like "Account Closed". The explanation is that someone in ancient times upvoted you, but their account was closed so the karma is being taken back due to the reversed upvote, as if it never happened.
And here's the telling footnote, that went something like "Ummmm… if closing
an account would cause too much disruption we have a special procedure to close accounts without reversing the upvotes".
Now, why would they have to go through the hassle of implementing a process that gets rid of high karma accounts, without backing out the rep change…
Keep in mind that high karma accounts are also more likely to have a large number of upvotes of others, too.
--- MBSE BBS v1.1.1 (Linux-x86_64)
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)