• Would Bradman have scored so many runs with TODAY'S FIELDING STANDARDS

    From FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri May 17 15:30:06 2024
    Subject: Would Bradman have scored so many runs with TODAY'S FIELDING
    STANDARDS in his era




    https://www.thecricketmonthly.com/story/1430929/2024-men-s-t20-world-cup---how-t20-has-changed-cricket-forever



    Fielders of our dreams

    Watch highlights of any game from the 20th century and you will be
    struck by the standard of fielding - and not in a good way. You'd be
    lucky to see anyone sliding along the outfield, trying to prevent a
    boundary. More often, fielders escort the ball like bodyguards, keeping
    their distance.



    Question:

    Would BRADMAN have scored so many runs IF fielding in his era was as
    good as it is NOW?





    Luck of the coin

    Once the simplest part of any game, the toss has increasingly
    convoluted, and at times has seemed to determine the outcomes of whole tournaments. In the era of the impact player, IPL captains walk out to
    the toss with two separate team sheets and name a different XI depending
    on whether they are batting or bowling first.


    But the real change at the toss is its outsized ability to influence
    results in T20, particularly in floodlit games where conditions change significantly from one innings to the next. There is a slight bias in
    favour of chasing teams across T20 history but in certain tournaments
    there has been a clear sense of "win the toss, win the game": at the T20
    World Cup in the UAE in 2021, chasing teams won 22 out of 33 floodlit
    matches from the Super 12s stage onwards, including all three knockout
    games. Australia, the eventual champions, won the toss in all six of
    their victories; the only time they lost the toss, they were thrashed by England in Dubai.



    Question:

    Is Australia LUCKY to WIN so many tosses which helped them to WIN even
    the 2023 ODI World Cup?


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From David North@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat May 18 23:53:08 2024
    Subject: Re: Would Bradman have scored so many runs with TODAY'S FIELDING
    STANDARDS in his era

    On 17/05/2024 06:30, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:

    Question:

    Is Australia LUCKY to WIN so many tosses which helped them to WIN even
    the 2023 ODI World Cup?

    Considering that they lost one more toss than they won, and that their
    only two defeats came after winning the toss, I'm going for 'No'.

    They were lucky to win one particular toss - in the final - but whether
    it would have changed the result if they had lost it is debatable.

    England, meanwhile, won 7 tosses out of 9, and a fat lot of good it did
    them.

    --
    David North


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: ---:- FTN<->UseNet Gate -:--- (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon May 20 04:25:22 2024
    Subject: Re: Would Bradman have scored so many runs with TODAY'S FIELDING
    STANDARDS in his era

    On 5/18/2024 6:53 AM, David North wrote:
    On 17/05/2024 06:30, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:

    Question:

    Is Australia LUCKY to WIN so many tosses which helped them to WIN even
    the 2023 ODI World Cup?

    Considering that they lost one more toss than they won, and that their
    only two defeats came after winning the toss, I'm going for 'No'.

    They were lucky to win one particular toss - in the final - but whether
    it would have changed the result if they had lost it is debatable.




    Yes, it would have changed the result.

    Even Australia knew that winning the toss made a huge difference in the finals.




    England, meanwhile, won 7 tosses out of 9, and a fat lot of good it did them.



    Toss didn't matter for England because the team was in a rut.



    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)