Lately I've been fascinated by the PL/I programming language.
On Mon, 26 Oct 2026 15:55:34 +0900, David Meyer wrote:
Lately I've been fascinated by the PL/I programming language.
Did you know at one point it was going to be called ?FORTRAN VI??
The original design plans were much more ambitious, but things somehow
got watered down over time -- like proposals for decent
argument-passing conventions were abandoned in favour of the same old wishy-washy FORTRAN approach -- because that?s what FORTRAN
programmers were used to.
The language doesn?t even have typedefs.
On 10/26/26 15:07, Lawrence D?Oliveiro wrote:
The language doesn?t even have typedefs.
Does now. Newish PL/I has a DEFINE statement.
I think many people were wrestling in this era with what
"conversational" programming should look like.
On Mon, 26 Oct 2026 21:35:30 -0700, Peter Flass wrote:
On 10/26/26 15:07, Lawrence D?Oliveiro wrote:
The language doesn?t even have typedefs.
Does now. Newish PL/I has a DEFINE statement.
Weren?t you saying before that this wasn?t necessary?
| Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 232:41:55 |
| Calls: | 221 |
| Files: | 21,513 |
| Messages: | 84,424 |