On Fri, 14 Nov 2025 16:09:47 -0500, c186282 wrote:
WordStar and close variants were VERY popular back in the day. Kind
of everyone's "first word processor".
Everyone used it alongside Lotus-123.
It was bundled on the Osborne 1 CP/M machine. I got a lot of miles out of
it as a programming editor in the text mode. When I finally moved to the
DOS world I bought Brief.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brief_(text_editor)
'ed' wasn't much fun. I think I way have had a freeware clone of vi that
was no Joy either. I guessing 95% of the people who say 'I use vi' never have. Most Linux distros bring up Vim if you type 'vi'. One exception is Arch. 'vi' is a hard link to ex which comes up in the visual mode for that old timey flavor.
I find it takes a lot of munging to get vim to *really* work like vi.
Well, squids & kids, but my fingers do vi automatically. Anything else
not so much.
On 16 Nov 2025 05:11:07 GMT, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
Well, squids & kids, but my fingers do vi automatically. Anything else
not so much.
I used it for many years, too, on proprietary Unix systems.
Once Linux came to dominate the scene, I made the choice to switch and not look back.
I was a little taken back, and a little disappointed, that when I
installed the latest Ubuntu (minimal) distribution, vi wasn't installed
by default. A sign of the times?
On Sun, 16 Nov 2025 12:15:51 -0000 (UTC), Ian wrote:
I was a little taken back, and a little disappointed, that when I
installed the latest Ubuntu (minimal) distribution, vi wasn't installed
by default. A sign of the times?
On my Ubuntu 25.10 box
$ which vi
/usr/bin/vi
ls -l /usr/bin/vi
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Sep 23 2022 /usr/bin/vi -> /etc/alternatives/vi
$ ls -l /etc/alternatives/vi
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Jan 9 2025 /etc/alternatives/vi -> /usr/bin/ vim.gtk3
On Sun, 16 Nov 2025 12:15:51 -0000 (UTC), Ian wrote:
I was a little taken back, and a little disappointed, that when I
installed the latest Ubuntu (minimal) distribution, vi wasn't installed
by default. A sign of the times?
Was there a default editor installed? A GUI one, perhaps?
* Ubuntu isn't my preferred choice for servers, or anything really, but this particular application was developed for it, and I haven't got the time or inclination to port it to a different distribution.
On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:24:27 -0000 (UTC), Ian wrote:
* Ubuntu isn't my preferred choice for servers, or anything really, but this >> particular application was developed for it, and I haven't got the time or >> inclination to port it to a different distribution.
What exactly was there about it that needed porting?
| Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| Users: | 14 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 216:23:51 |
| Calls: | 184 |
| Files: | 21,502 |
| Messages: | 82,076 |