• Re: Can anyone get Edge Copilot to work without logging in after July 2

    From Paul@3:633/10 to All on Sat Aug 8 01:03:14 2026
    Subject: Re: Can anyone get Edge Copilot to work without logging in after July 2026?

    On Fri, 8/7/2026 11:30 PM, Maria Sophia wrote:
    Interestingly, half way through the day today, the Copilot sidebar chat STOPPED working if you didn't log into a Microsoft Account.

    Is it just me?

    Or do others find that today, the Copilot sidebar chat changed how it works in that it won't do anything until you log into a Microsoft Account (which
    I don't have).


    The Reliability Monitor here, is showing

    9NRZT3Q9R3DL-Microsoft.WindowsAppRuntime.2

    getting updated every couple of days, no signs the
    update is malfunctioning in any way, but it does
    seem a fetish. There can't be bugs in it so bad,
    they're fixing them at that rate.

    The spacing of updates showing here, isn't as
    frequent as the rate of installation in my
    Reliability Monitor.

    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-app/whats-new

    Sometimes, other in-box Metro.Apps get updates and the
    update fails, and the update is retried later on and eventually
    it succeeds. This is not that kind of pattern.

    Paul


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.19
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From ....winston@3:633/10 to All on Sat Aug 8 12:29:44 2026
    Subject: Re: Can anyone get Edge Copilot to work without logging in after July 2026?

    On 08/08/2026 1:03 AM, Paul wrote:
    On Fri, 8/7/2026 11:30 PM, Maria Sophia wrote:
    Interestingly, half way through the day today, the Copilot sidebar chat
    STOPPED working if you didn't log into a Microsoft Account.

    Is it just me?

    Or do others find that today, the Copilot sidebar chat changed how it works >> in that it won't do anything until you log into a Microsoft Account (which >> I don't have).


    The Reliability Monitor here, is showing

    9NRZT3Q9R3DL-Microsoft.WindowsAppRuntime.2

    getting updated every couple of days, no signs the
    update is malfunctioning in any way, but it does
    seem a fetish. There can't be bugs in it so bad,
    they're fixing them at that rate.

    The spacing of updates showing here, isn't as
    frequent as the rate of installation in my
    Reliability Monitor.

    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-app/whats-new

    Sometimes, other in-box Metro.Apps get updates and the
    update fails, and the update is retried later on and eventually
    it succeeds. This is not that kind of pattern.

    Paul


    While hiccups can and do occur, the op's issue cause/symptom is more
    likely from having previously tampered with Windows default and/or oobe settings or mis-configured Edge settings.

    Fyi...on a Local account
    - No MSA sign-on in Windows, Edge, Mail(Outlook app, not Office) and
    also no MSA sign-on in related MSA required apps/programs(OneDrive).
    - Edge Sidebar chat is enabled, works fine and all without prompt for
    MSA logon....which is the expected and design intent norm.
    - no app updates(Edge or CoPilot) modify anything forcing the Copilot Sidebar sign-on


    Additionally, even in a Windows MSA Logon account, signing out
    completely in Edge and Office, the Copilot Sidebar chat functions the
    same as the Local account(no MSA sign-on required for use).


    --
    ...w­¤?ñ?¤

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.19
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Paul@3:633/10 to All on Sat Aug 8 14:56:47 2026
    Subject: Re: Can anyone get Edge Copilot to work without logging in after July 2026?

    On Sat, 8/8/2026 12:29 PM, ....winston wrote:


    While hiccups can and do occur, the op's issue cause/symptom is more likely from having previously tampered with Windows default and/or oobe settings or mis-configured Edge settings.

    Fyi...on a Local account
    ÿ- No MSA sign-on in Windows, Edge, Mail(Outlook app, not Office) and also no MSA sign-on in related MSA required apps/programs(OneDrive).
    ÿ- Edge Sidebar chat is enabled, works fine and all without prompt for MSA logon....which is the expected and design intent norm.
    ÿ- no app updates(Edge or CoPilot) modify anything forcing the Copilot Sidebar sign-on


    Additionally, even in a Windows MSA Logon account, signing out completely in Edge and Office,
    the Copilot Sidebar chat functions the same as the Local account(no MSA sign-on required for use).

    For a Metro.App, is there ever a situation where an MSA prompt
    appears before the application agrees to start ?

    I presume in all these cases, the Metro.App was determined by licensing,
    to be allowed to install. And the behavior is a request by the Metro.App
    itself later (now running and allowed to run), for the MSA, giving access
    to something perhaps. Like something stored in the Cloud is being accessed.

    All the context the CoPilot program could need, could be stored
    on the local disk, with the exception if the model of usage allowed
    moving to any computer and continuing the session. Is there a kind
    of global setting which says "we don't need to synchronize our sessions
    across computers" ? At one time, there was the concept of passing
    work between computers and their interfaces.

    Paul





    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.19
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From ....winston@3:633/10 to All on Sun Aug 9 14:45:47 2026
    Subject: Re: Can anyone get Edge Copilot to work without logging in after July 2026?

    On 08/08/2026 2:56 PM, Paul wrote:
    On Sat, 8/8/2026 12:29 PM, ....winston wrote:


    While hiccups can and do occur, the op's issue cause/symptom is more likely from having previously tampered with Windows default and/or oobe settings or mis-configured Edge settings.

    Fyi...on a Local account
    ÿ- No MSA sign-on in Windows, Edge, Mail(Outlook app, not Office) and also no MSA sign-on in related MSA required apps/programs(OneDrive).
    ÿ- Edge Sidebar chat is enabled, works fine and all without prompt for MSA logon....which is the expected and design intent norm.
    ÿ- no app updates(Edge or CoPilot) modify anything forcing the Copilot Sidebar sign-on


    Additionally, even in a Windows MSA Logon account, signing out completely in Edge and Office,
    the Copilot Sidebar chat functions the same as the Local account(no MSA sign-on required for use).

    For a Metro.App, is there ever a situation where an MSA prompt
    appears before the application agrees to start ?

    Yes and No.
    The most common Windows Microsoft included apps do not require a MSA
    sign-on for use(e.g. Outlook mail app[fka Mail], Photos, Music, Maps).

    If one desires sync(settings, messages or files across devices) or
    integration with cloud features like Outlook.com/OneDrive an MSA is
    necessary. The OneDrive folder(2 way sync) in File Explorer requires an
    MSA.




    I presume in all these cases, the Metro.App was determined by licensing,
    to be allowed to install. And the behavior is a request by the Metro.App itself later (now running and allowed to run), for the MSA, giving access
    to something perhaps. Like something stored in the Cloud is being accessed.

    The term Metro.app no longer applies. The term was only Windows 8.0
    unique. Included apps for 8.1 was Modern apps, 10.x and later was
    termed Store or Windows apps to represent/describe UWP(Universal Windows Platform) apps...up until 2021. In 2021, development under the UWP
    naming ceased - since then in Win10/11, anything formerly UWP or newer[included desktop] are just 'Apps'.


    All the context the CoPilot program could need, could be stored
    on the local disk, with the exception if the model of usage allowed
    moving to any computer and continuing the session. Is there a kind
    of global setting which says "we don't need to synchronize our sessions across computers" ? At one time, there was the concept of passing
    work between computers and their interfaces.

    CoPilot Sidebar is not entirely the same as CoPilot(Windows) or CoPilot
    on the web.

    Sidebar is browser primarily intended but not specific to work with the
    open web page.
    Windows Copilot is intended for use across the device(tasks, files,
    settings, apps)
    Web version is stand-alone no integration with browser or OS.

    For the most part, trying to over-analyze it since it's subject to
    change is futile.
    i.e use it or ignore it!!!


    Paul






    --
    ...w­¤?ñ?¤

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.19
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Paul@3:633/10 to All on Sun Aug 9 18:57:27 2026
    Subject: Re: Can anyone get Edge Copilot to work without logging in after July 2026?

    On Sun, 8/9/2026 1:41 PM, Andy Burns wrote:
    Maria Sophia wrote:

    Moving forward, given Gemini limits free chats as does ChatGPT, I'm going

    I presume access to the AI chatbots is also blocked (without login) from the Firefox sidebar?

    <https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/ai-chatbot>

    I have all AI (apart from website language translation disabled).

    Well, you have to be able to take a joke.

    I've tried out three models so far. Not really all
    that adventurous at running local models (on inadequate hardware).

    16GB of RAM would handle the 7GB or so Gemma 4 E4B needs (a bit weak model).
    64GB of RAM would handle the 35GB or so Gemma 4 31B needed.
    128GB of RAM would handle the 80GB the OpenAi 120B one needed.

    Two are loaded in a Windows copy of LMStudio.
    One is loaded in a Linux copy of LMStudio.

    The tale starts with the following query.

    Write a program in the C language that computes the mathematical constant PI to one million digits

    I started out, not really caring about the code :-)
    The mission here, was to see if an LLM-AI could "actually finish a mission". Can it work its little pencil, until the pencil is just a stub.
    The longest question runtime, was 50 minutes. Another of the runs
    took 23 minutes.

    1) With E4B, all it did was write a file full of "comment text"

    /* Comment text about how I would write your program */

    Utterly... useless. Like tits on a chest freezer.

    2) So I tried 31B. First I had it attempt the feat in the C language.

    It burbled along for a bit, talking to itself. It always
    announces "what the BEST algorithm is". Then it just happens
    to mention one of the older or inferior algorithms and it writes
    code for that! Then in the comments, it happens to mention
    "If I implemented the Binary Splitting Algorithm, that would
    be 200 lines of code." That's its excuse for why the homework
    assignment is late. A virtual dog ate the homework.

    3) Now, knowing from previous work I've done, that the C++ version
    of Bignum code is half the length of the C version (and runs at half
    the speed, so this is not a free lunch), I "cut the AI a break" by
    reducing that BSA-toughness issue, to a potential 100 lines of code.

    Write a program in the C++ language that computes
    the mathematical constant PI to one million digits

    This time it writes Chudnovsky, without BSA. And this time, it
    volunteers the comment about BSA, that "it would take five hundred
    lines of C++ to implement BSA and I could make an off-by-one error
    while writing it". So now I know, it is pulling its complexity
    estimates from the AI nether region (the hole where the slop comes out) :-)

    OK, so now I go online, and ask for a Chudnovsky with BSA. It's
    almost the first hit in the Google search. It is C++ .

    ( https://gist.github.com/komasaru/68f209118edbac0700da )

    /*
    * Compute PQT (by Binary Splitting Algorithm)
    */
    PQT Chudnovsky::compPQT(int n1, int n2)
    {
    int m;
    PQT res;

    if (n1 + 1 == n2) {
    res.P = (2 * n2 - 1);
    res.P *= (6 * n2 - 1);
    res.P *= (6 * n2 - 5);
    res.Q = C3_24 * n2 * n2 * n2;
    res.T = (A + B * n2) * res.P;
    if ((n2 & 1) == 1) res.T = - res.T;
    } else {
    m = (n1 + n2) / 2;
    PQT res1 = compPQT(n1, m);
    PQT res2 = compPQT(m, n2);
    res.P = res1.P * res2.P;
    res.Q = res1.Q * res2.Q;
    res.T = res1.T * res2.Q + res1.P * res2.T;
    }

    return res;
    }

    Notice that this is 23 lines of code :-) Nether regions, my ass.
    Now, is that code "scary" or what ? Does your little AI heart
    tremble at the thought of coughing up a hairball like that ?
    The code is recursive and calls itself, but that does not
    normally cause shyness in AI.

    So let's run that puppy. I ran it for two million digits,
    because the above code is missing the "+ 64 bits" thing
    you're supposed to add for the guard digits, which helps ensure
    the last digits in your millions of digits, are correct.

    $ ./chudnovskyBSA
    **** PI Computation ( 2000000 digits )
    TIME (COMPUTE): 0.664249 seconds.
    TIME (WRITE) : 0.172128 seconds.

    That code runs *ten times* faster than SuperPI 1.5 XS .
    You could re-write the code in C and shave more time off it.

    I don't think humans are obsolete, quite yet. Tip of the
    hat to komasaru for the code.

    Paul

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.19
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)