Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
From: PBS Reporting <PBS@invalid.invalid>\_________ NYMSHIFTER ____________/
Message-ID: <106m003$1b622$1@paganini.bofh.team>Could test on this -----\__________________/
<snipped off-topic political spam>
PBS Reporting <PBS@invalid.invalid> wrote:I like your idea, but can it be done with Thunderbird? And can you say it in 5 words or
Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
From: PBS Reporting <PBS@invalid.invalid>\_________ NYMSHIFTER ____________/
Message-ID: <106m003$1b622$1@paganini.bofh.team>Could test on this -----\__________________/
<snipped off-topic political spam>
I gave up on paganini.bofh.team. I hide posts that originate from
there. Below is the filter I use to hide those posts.
# Has registered (login) and unregistered (no login) access but no
# headers to identify access type. Paganini becomes the new Google
# Groups for trolls.
!setcolor(olive;yellow),ignore,markread
Header {(?-s)^Path: \S+!paganini\.bofh\.team(!tor-network)?(!not-for-mail)?$}
The Header line is the filter testing on the injection node of the PATH header. While clients can use their own Message-ID value, clients don't
get to touch the PATH header, so abusers can't lie there.
To test on the PATH header requires downloading more than just the
overview headers. PATH is not an overview header. The filter looks for
the injection node in PATH to show the source in paganini. I don't
delete unwanted article. I hide them, so I could see them if I choose.
Also, deleting them can break the chain of tracking subthreads.
Deleting an article could result in subthreads appearing as new threads.
I configure my client to apply the Ignore flag to child articles. I
don't want to see replies to article I'm hiding.
Rather than the PATH header, I could test on the Message-ID (MID) header since its right-token identifies paganini. However, if a client
specified a value for MID, the server is supposed to not override with
its own value. Since clients can specify the value, it is not a
reliable header on which to test. While PATH is a non-overview header
(which requires you download the full article, or use a client that
support XPAT *and* the server also supports it), MID is an overview
header, so you should be able to filter without having to download full articles.
I don't need to colorize those posts, but I hide posts instead of delete them. My default view is Hide Ignored, but occasionally I switch to
View All, and would like colors to aid in why posts were hidden.
Yeah, you end up tossing all good posters using paganini along with the
bad posters. paganini has unregistered (unauthenticated) access, and
that spurs the trolls to abuse paganini just like they abused Google
Groups and AIOE. paganini, I believe, also has registered
(authenticated) access, but you'll have to try to find its operator to
figure out the setup (he sometimes shows up in alt.free.newsservers).
His placeholder web site is worthless. No information there. I never figured out if there was any difference in headers to identify posters
using his unregistered access versus his registered access, so I just
hid all of paganini, because of all the aholes abusing it.
Google Groups got so bad with spammers, trolls, malcontents, forgers, peuriles, and uber-boobs that I filtered them out; see:
http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/
AIOE became just as bad (died in Jan 2023). Now paganini is the new
Google Groups. *UN*registered free Usenet providers attract the worst posters. There is no account to punish abusers. Eternal-September is a registered free Usenet provider: there is an account to punish by
suspending or killing it. Not a huge hurdle to create another account
to then abuse, but it does present a hurdle.
On 8/2/25 11:10 PM, VanguardLH wrote:
PBS Reporting <PBS@invalid.invalid> wrote:I like your idea, but can it be done with Thunderbird? And can you
Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
From: PBS Reporting <PBS@invalid.invalid>\_________ NYMSHIFTER ____________/
Message-ID: <106m003$1b622$1@paganini.bofh.team>Could test on this -----\__________________/
<snipped off-topic political spam>
I gave up on paganini.bofh.team. I hide posts that originate from
there. Below is the filter I use to hide those posts.
# Has registered (login) and unregistered (no login) access but no
# headers to identify access type. Paganini becomes the new Google
# Groups for trolls.
!setcolor(olive;yellow),ignore,markread
Header {(?-s)^Path: \S+!paganini\.bofh\.team(!tor-network)?(!not-for-mail)?$}
The Header line is the filter testing on the injection node of the PATH
header. While clients can use their own Message-ID value, clients don't
get to touch the PATH header, so abusers can't lie there.
To test on the PATH header requires downloading more than just the
overview headers. PATH is not an overview header. The filter looks for
the injection node in PATH to show the source in paganini. I don't
delete unwanted article. I hide them, so I could see them if I choose.
Also, deleting them can break the chain of tracking subthreads.
Deleting an article could result in subthreads appearing as new threads.
I configure my client to apply the Ignore flag to child articles. I
don't want to see replies to article I'm hiding.
Rather than the PATH header, I could test on the Message-ID (MID) header
since its right-token identifies paganini. However, if a client
specified a value for MID, the server is supposed to not override with
its own value. Since clients can specify the value, it is not a
reliable header on which to test. While PATH is a non-overview header
(which requires you download the full article, or use a client that
support XPAT *and* the server also supports it), MID is an overview
header, so you should be able to filter without having to download full
articles.
I don't need to colorize those posts, but I hide posts instead of delete
them. My default view is Hide Ignored, but occasionally I switch to
View All, and would like colors to aid in why posts were hidden.
Yeah, you end up tossing all good posters using paganini along with the
bad posters. paganini has unregistered (unauthenticated) access, and
that spurs the trolls to abuse paganini just like they abused Google
Groups and AIOE. paganini, I believe, also has registered
(authenticated) access, but you'll have to try to find its operator to
figure out the setup (he sometimes shows up in alt.free.newsservers).
His placeholder web site is worthless. No information there. I never
figured out if there was any difference in headers to identify posters
using his unregistered access versus his registered access, so I just
hid all of paganini, because of all the aholes abusing it.
Google Groups got so bad with spammers, trolls, malcontents, forgers,
peuriles, and uber-boobs that I filtered them out; see:
http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/
AIOE became just as bad (died in Jan 2023). Now paganini is the new
Google Groups. *UN*registered free Usenet providers attract the worst
posters. There is no account to punish abusers. Eternal-September is a
registered free Usenet provider: there is an account to punish by
suspending or killing it. Not a huge hurdle to create another account
to then abuse, but it does present a hurdle.
say it in 5 words or less, my eyes started blurring this early in the morning. If you use TB, the easy thing is to extract the filter from msgFilterRules.dat and paste it here. THKS
Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
---|---|
Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
Users: | 11 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 47:59:38 |
Calls: | 166 |
Files: | 21,502 |
Messages: | 77,696 |