On 2025-07-15 14:49, T wrote:
On 7/14/25 11:42 AM, Java Jive wrote:
Mistaken, they found him guilty of sexual abuse, but didn't actually
go so far as rape:
Not to split hairs with you, but this was a "civil"
case. There is no "guilt" in a civil case. He
was found "liable".
Fair enough (though it is splitting hairs which you claimed to eschew),
but how does that make him any more or less a rapist?
And please take this kind of stuff to an appropriate
group, such as
alt.politics.scorched-earth
And leave this group to computers and Windows.
Point taken, but these remarks would be better directed at those who
first introduced the OT subthread.
Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
---|---|
Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
Users: | 11 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 50:50:56 |
Calls: | 166 |
Files: | 21,502 |
Messages: | 77,738 |