Chill out, man.
People often use terminology in idiosyncratic ways.
.... which CAN lead to mis-understandings!!
On 11/02/2025 12:00 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 08:47:39 +0100, Arno Welzel wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2025-02-09 00:35:
So you never used core memory.
Correct. But core memory is not intended as *persistent* memory,
even when it can be used this way.
It was indeed regularly used that way. Consider that, on machines
from the core memory era, there was no ?boot ROM?. The first-stage bootloader was typically around a dozen machine instructions or so,
which had to be hand- entered using front-panel switches.
I remember having to do that on a PDP-8 (was it??) in 1982-3.
(No doubt seasoned operators had this memorized.) It was handy that
this could be preserved across power cycles, assuming it didn?t get overwritten by some wayward buggy program.
Then there were applications that ran without an OS as such. For
example, on the PDP-8, you could load a BASIC interpreter. This would
take about 20 minutes to load off paper tape. So the fact that a
power cycle did not wipe memory was helpful if you had a lot of BASIC programs to run.
On 14/05/2025 10:54 pm, Frank Slootweg wrote:
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 11/02/2025 12:00 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 08:47:39 +0100, Arno Welzel wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2025-02-09 00:35:
So you never used core memory.
Correct. But core memory is not intended as *persistent* memory,
even when it can be used this way.
It was indeed regularly used that way. Consider that, on machines
from the core memory era, there was no ?boot ROM?. The first-stage
bootloader was typically around a dozen machine instructions or so,
which had to be hand- entered using front-panel switches.
I remember having to do that on a PDP-8 (was it??) in 1982-3.
That seems rather late!
For computing, yes, that might seem rather late ... but for its purpose (Training us in how an Aust Army Direction Finding system worked) it was quite reasonable. I don't know what the actual DF system used.
Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
---|---|
Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
Users: | 8 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 89:37:33 |
Calls: | 161 |
Files: | 21,502 |
Messages: | 78,348 |